Go Back   Comic Book Resources Forums > Marvel Comics Forums > Ultimate Marvel

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-15-2009, 08:56 PM   #1
VRaptorX
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 825
Default Is Ultimate Universe is as credible as 616?

I say yes. It has almost a decade of continuity and has had mini series and side stories that do not fit in the main canon. You can't be an alternate universe if you have your own what if stories. You are now a full fledged universe just as credible as 616....but I still see so many people say, "oh it doesn't matter what garbage they do to Ultimate line. It's not 616."
VRaptorX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 01:52 PM   #2
Cloudman
Senior Member
 
Cloudman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The UK
Posts: 2,385
Default

Well, it was. Before Loeb, it was an extremely credible universe. I'm just hoping that Bendis, Millar and Ellis choose to not make references to Ultimatum. No doubt Loeb will, but 2 good ongoings and 1 good mini isn't bad for an alternate universe.
Cloudman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2009, 03:26 PM   #3
bjmorga
Junior Member
 
bjmorga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 149
Default

I don't think there's an issue of credibility. Any well written story has credibility; it doesn't matter what moniker it falls under. I think the issue now is whether or not the line has staying power after the events of Ultimatum. I don't think many fans were clamoring for the story that happened in that event. I don't believe anyone was requesting any of teh twists and turns that we have read there thus far.
bjmorga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 02:19 PM   #4
The Master Meglomaniac
Veteran Member
 
The Master Meglomaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,804
Default

I don't think its as credible, well because of all the bad story lines Loeb has created and because the characterization isn't as strong as with the 616 universe.
The Master Meglomaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 04:31 PM   #5
Mr Omnis
Wait--what?
 
Mr Omnis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 250
Default

616 is only as credible as it is because it's significantly older than Ultimate. To disregard Ultimate Marvel as "not credible" is more a form of elitism than anything else. It's credible within itself, even though its fanbase isn't, comparably, as large.

Loeb, however, has damaged it a bit with what he's done.
__________________
21Six.net - Where Jesus Files His Taxes


My mind is like a jungle that's on fire. And the fire is obviously made of unicorns. And pie. Firemen go to put out the fire, but you can't extinguish the magic that is unicorns, pie, and unicorns made of pie.
Mr Omnis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 04:37 PM   #6
NickGuy
I miss my daughter
 
NickGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Master Meglomaniac View Post
I don't think its as credible, well because of all the bad story lines Loeb has created and because the characterization isn't as strong as with the 616 universe.
616 has just as many, many more "bad" stories. if anything, Loebs inclusion in the ultimate universe makes it MORE credible and adds another side to it, otherwise it feels like bendismillarverse.
__________________
deviantart myspace facebook twitter KFK
NickGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 01:41 AM   #7
striderhirryu2
Bullseye.
 
striderhirryu2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickGuy View Post
616 has just as many, many more "bad" stories. if anything, Loebs inclusion in the ultimate universe makes it MORE credible and adds another side to it, otherwise it feels like bendismillarverse.
Why did we need cartoony Superheroics when people loved the realism of the BendisMillar-verse? As far as I can see, Loeb hasn't actually contributed anything to the Ultimate U. When I say contributed it's along the lines of creation. He starts with Ultimates 3. Created nothing, just decided to retcon Millar's stories and kill his characters. Ultimatum he's gone on a killing spree taking out everyone's creations from Millar and BKV to Bendis' and Kirman. He took Zarda from the Supreme Power Universe in Ultimate Power and decides to make Nick Fury look like a douchebag at every chance possible. There's alot of take involved in Loeb's work but I honestly can't see any give aside from Ultimate Kaazar and Shanna, and they were as shallow as the end of the swimming pool with the sponge dinosaur. Oh and Black Panther, but his relevence is non-existent.

Last edited by striderhirryu2; 07-18-2009 at 02:16 AM.
striderhirryu2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 06:32 AM   #8
carabas
Storyteller
 
carabas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belgium.
Posts: 10,631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickGuy View Post
if anything, Loebs inclusion in the ultimate universe makes it MORE credible...
How does removing the political undertones, more natural characterisation and realistically styled costumes (so basically anything that was remotely credible) lend more credibility to the Ultimate Universe?
__________________
FarScape: best frelling science fiction show ever.
Accept no substitute.
carabas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 08:56 AM   #9
The Master Meglomaniac
Veteran Member
 
The Master Meglomaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickGuy View Post
616 has just as many, many more "bad" stories. if anything, Loebs inclusion in the ultimate universe makes it MORE credible and adds another side to it, otherwise it feels like bendismillarverse.
It only has more bad stories because its been around longer and almost none of those stories are half as as loeb's.

The problem is Loeb's stories are trying to tear apart of the entire UU, you would never get a crossover where so important characters are killed off in such a disgusting manner in the 616 universe.

I also maintain the characterization is better in the 616 universe.
The Master Meglomaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 11:01 AM   #10
NickGuy
I miss my daughter
 
NickGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
Default

well the original question is if the ultimate universe is credible...i think that having more creators contribute to it gives it more credibility. whether good or bad
__________________
deviantart myspace facebook twitter KFK
NickGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 11:24 AM   #11
carabas
Storyteller
 
carabas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Belgium.
Posts: 10,631
Default

How are you defining credibility here?
__________________
FarScape: best frelling science fiction show ever.
Accept no substitute.
carabas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 11:40 AM   #12
Mr Omnis
Wait--what?
 
Mr Omnis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carabas View Post
How does removing the political undertones, more natural characterisation and realistically styled costumes (so basically anything that was remotely credible) lend more credibility to the Ultimate Universe?
Because it's more like a superhero comic from the worst parts of the 90s now. All that really matters, it would seem, is how many writers a company/brand has, as opposed to how high the quality of work is.
__________________
21Six.net - Where Jesus Files His Taxes


My mind is like a jungle that's on fire. And the fire is obviously made of unicorns. And pie. Firemen go to put out the fire, but you can't extinguish the magic that is unicorns, pie, and unicorns made of pie.
Mr Omnis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 12:10 PM   #13
NickGuy
I miss my daughter
 
NickGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carabas View Post
How are you defining credibility here?
credibility as a comic book "universe"...im defining it as a credible universe that, much like marvel started with stan an djack, has been added to and more aspects brought in by new creators. i think if it was still just bendis and millar this whole time, it wouldnt be as credible to me, because it would just feel like its own little side project by two people.
__________________
deviantart myspace facebook twitter KFK
NickGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 02:12 PM   #14
Cloudman
Senior Member
 
Cloudman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The UK
Posts: 2,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickGuy View Post
credibility as a comic book "universe"...im defining it as a credible universe that, much like marvel started with stan an djack, has been added to and more aspects brought in by new creators. i think if it was still just bendis and millar this whole time, it wouldnt be as credible to me, because it would just feel like its own little side project by two people.
One, Bendis and Millar were not even close to being the only contributors to the Ultimate Universe before Loeb, and two, if it's poor quality writing, it only makes the universe less credible.
Cloudman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 03:40 PM   #15
NickGuy
I miss my daughter
 
NickGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,407
Default

i think we are defining credibility different. i think you are defining it from a character standpoint, while im defining it by an overall creator standpoint. i knowbendis and millar werent the only contributors, but loeb was the only contributor who has done something big and eventful in the ultimate universe, IMO.
__________________
deviantart myspace facebook twitter KFK
NickGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1996-2010 Boiling Point Internet DBA Comic Book Resources. All Rights Reserved.