Comic Book Resources

IssunBoshi · 11-09-2009, 10:19 PM

1) Who killed more people?

2) Who is more ruthless?

3) Who would beat each other in a fight?

critical mass · 11-09-2009, 10:30 PM

1. Nazis - Don't quote me on this, but the Nazis probably killed more people than there were people in Spain at the time.

2. Nazis - at least the Spanish gave their victims the chance to convert to Catholicism. Nazis would kill you because of your supposedly inferior blood. No mercy.

3. Nazis - Umm, duh??

Nazis stomp.

Captain Avenger · 11-09-2009, 10:34 PM

Nazis in all three. And Soviet Russia(particularly under Stalin) would be a better match for them.

Sir Fury · 11-10-2009, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Avenger

Nazis in all three. And Soviet Russia(particularly under Stalin) would be a better match for them.

Not really, as we found out in WWII.

sun tzu · 11-10-2009, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir Fury

Not really, as we found out in WWII.

What? That fight lasted for several years. Hardly a stomp, I say.

BYC · 11-10-2009, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sun tzu

What? That fight lasted for several years. Hardly a stomp, I say.

Without surprise, I don't think Germany would have done as well as it had. Soviet weapons were slightly inferior, but the main problem was Stalin, for some insane reason, believed in his heart that Hitler would not break their agreement and attack the Soviets. From what I remember, Stalin was in shock for many many days, slowing Soviet defenses and retreats.

sun tzu · 11-10-2009, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYC

Without surprise, I don't think Germany would have done as well as it had. Soviet weapons were slightly inferior, but the main problem was Stalin, for some insane reason, believed in his heart that Hitler would not break their agreement and attack the Soviets. From what I remember, Stalin was in shock for many many days, slowing Soviet defenses and retreats.

On the other hand, Germany was fighting on several fronts.

Lasko8734 · 11-10-2009, 06:55 AM

sharps gonna close this

I also nominated Nazis for all 3

**Sharpandpointies** · 11-10-2009, 07:08 AM

We're fine discussing military might, historical facts, that sort of thing.

It's when we get into religion and politics that things go out the window.

Hiromi · 11-10-2009, 07:18 AM

I dunno but I do know which one is more unexpected.

cosmic eagle · 11-10-2009, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYC

Without surprise, I don't think Germany would have done as well as it had. Soviet weapons were slightly inferior, but the main problem was Stalin, for some insane reason, believed in his heart that Hitler would not break their agreement and attack the Soviets. From what I remember, Stalin was in shock for many many days, slowing Soviet defenses and retreats.

No, main problem was surprise. Germans pushed too deep in for the USSR to get their act together

Sound Silence · 11-10-2009, 09:34 AM

[insert obligatory monty python reference here]

...ten characters. apprently stuff inside brackets doesn't count.

Tlaloc01 · 11-10-2009, 09:36 AM

At 3; the Nazis would win in both aspects of "with all resources" and in "hand to hand."

Alexander the immortal · 11-10-2009, 09:58 AM

The way i see it ,

Stalin was a genius on the strategic geopolitic level while he pretty much sucked at most other things. Hitler was better than Stalin on a purely tactical level and helping his army enforce the blitzerg strategy , but on a geopolitic strategic level he was inferior to not only Stalin but to many many many people.

BYC · 11-10-2009, 11:52 AM

Hitler was a moron in the arts of war. I do not recall if he pushed for blitzkrieg strategy and tactics, but that was his one huge lucky guess. My favorite of his failures was when he took far too long to reinforce Army Group Center (or was it South?) in the campaign against Stalingrad, and then sent in troops right when they were flanked and encircled, resulting in total loss for an entire army group.

11-09-2009, 10:19 PM	#1
IssunBoshi Deathwatch Champion. Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: New York City, New York Posts: 4,191	Nazi's vs. Spanish Inquisition 1) Who killed more people? 2) Who is more ruthless? 3) Who would beat each other in a fight? __________________ Current Mood: Worried Currently Playing: Nothing much at the moment "I don't help people..... I kill them......" ~ Jack Cayman Madworld - Body That: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYKS-iDvZCY

11-09-2009, 10:34 PM	#3
Captain Avenger Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,265	hm Nazis in all three. And Soviet Russia(particularly under Stalin) would be a better match for them.

11-10-2009, 06:55 AM	#8
Lasko8734 Latverian Monarch Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Da 315, Keepin it live! Salt City! Posts: 2,685	sharps gonna close this I also nominated Nazis for all 3 __________________ But He is Doom! Heres my Business card

11-10-2009, 07:08 AM	#9
Sharpandpointies Moderator Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Ottawa, Canada Posts: 33,167	We're fine discussing military might, historical facts, that sort of thing. It's when we get into religion and politics that things go out the window. __________________ DC MA Speed Fisk 1 2 CIS Ghost on Katana Nik's Rumbles Miburo's... ...wit

11-10-2009, 07:18 AM	#10
Hiromi Devil in a labcoat Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Fort Hood, Texas Posts: 7,719	I dunno but I do know which one is more unexpected. __________________ "Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall into an open sewer and die." -Mel Brooks

11-09-2009, 10:30 PM	#2
critical mass YOU HA SHOCK Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 836	1. Nazis - Don't quote me on this, but the Nazis probably killed more people than there were people in Spain at the time. 2. Nazis - at least the Spanish gave their victims the chance to convert to Catholicism. Nazis would kill you because of your supposedly inferior blood. No mercy. 3. Nazis - Umm, duh?? Nazis stomp.

11-10-2009, 09:34 AM	#12
Sound Silence Cruel and Unusual Join Date: May 2007 Location: Cloudcuckooland Posts: 9,711	[insert obligatory monty python reference here] ...ten characters. apprently stuff inside brackets doesn't count. __________________ Cast of the Rumblers RPG Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.

11-10-2009, 09:36 AM	#13
Tlaloc01 Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 646	At 3; the Nazis would win in both aspects of "with all resources" and in "hand to hand."

11-10-2009, 09:58 AM	#14
Alexander the immortal Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 1,074	The way i see it , Stalin was a genius on the strategic geopolitic level while he pretty much sucked at most other things. Hitler was better than Stalin on a purely tactical level and helping his army enforce the blitzerg strategy , but on a geopolitic strategic level he was inferior to not only Stalin but to many many many people.

11-10-2009, 11:52 AM	#15
BYC The King is always around Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Washington DC Posts: 3,081	Hitler was a moron in the arts of war. I do not recall if he pushed for blitzkrieg strategy and tactics, but that was his one huge lucky guess. My favorite of his failures was when he took far too long to reinforce Army Group Center (or was it South?) in the campaign against Stalingrad, and then sent in troops right when they were flanked and encircled, resulting in total loss for an entire army group.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode