Rick Olney--Fibber or Mega-Giganta-Fibber?

[Danny Donovan]

Originally Posted by MacQuarrie

He's not that old. I'm damn near as old as he is.

But anyway, this is Rick "Galloping Ego" Olney we're talking about. When you combine his inflated self-image with his cheapskate nature, the only possible outcome is that he will attempt to represent himself in court.

If he's as good a lawyer as he is a publisher, he'll probably get the chair.

Mac, when I said "old" I didn't mean as in elderly, I just meant for the most part at a certain age courts tend to have a bleeding heart, unless you've committed murder or some horrendous crime. Say the law says for fraud cases of this kind, the thing is 15-20. Already in his late 50s and not in the best of health, a lawyer could argue that putting someone in his condition in a state pen could be considered a life sentence.

Now if he DOES represent himself, the court may not give a damn because he's pissed them off so much. But you'd be hard pressed to see him get a lot of time, at most, if convicted, perhaps 3 or 4 years with an extended probation time.

[TonyIsabella]

I'm so proud

Mr. Isabella,

Why do you remind me of a clogged toilet? Welcome to
the short list for actionable libel.

Rick Olney

I'm not going to respond to him, of course, but it's once again clear that he's talking without benefit of a lawyer.

It's not libel to express one's opinion, direct readers to a website where they can get details of a situation, and to caution readers against doing business with someone. All constitutionally-protected speech.

And, as I've said elsewhere and maybe even here, I hereby grant permission for anyone to repost my warning in the venues available to them.

I'm continuing to get grateful e-mails from folks who had not been priviously aware of Olney, so there remains a need to spread the word.

Tony

[AIPman1]

There will come a point, when he tries to sue EVERYONE IN THE WORLD, that he'll get to know the term "frivolous lawsuits" and won't be allowed to file them. When the judges have become familiar with all he has done, and all the evidence against him, he will most certainally be laughed out of court. Slander isn't slander if it's true. "didn't you just try to sue XXXXX for this same thing?" "Uh, yes judge, I tried to tell you they are ALL out to get me" - "Well, have you paid anyone yet?" - "Uh, no judge, I was told I have to settle all my court cases before I can." - "So, you're suing this person for saying you haven't paid anyone, and can't pay anyone until everyone stops saying you haven't paid anyone" - "That's right sir" - "Well...I suggest you go pay someone"

[Rick Olney]

Originally Posted by TonyIsabella

I'm so proud



I'm not going to respond to him, of course, but it's once again clear that he's talking without benefit of a lawyer.

It's not libel to express one's opinion, direct readers to a website where they can get details of a situation, and to caution readers against doing business with someone. All constitutionally-protected speech.

And, as I've said elsewhere and maybe even here, I hereby grant permission for anyone to repost my warning in the venues available to them.

I'm continuing to get grateful e-mails from folks who had not been priviously aware of Olney, so there remains a need to spread the word.

Tony

Good. You'll need to produce them at some point and time.

[Rick Olney]

Originally Posted by AIPman1

There will come a point, when he tries to sue EVERYONE IN THE WORLD, that he'll get to know the term "frivolous lawsuits" and won't be allowed to file them. When the judges have become familiar with all he has done, and all the evidence against him, he will most certainally be laughed out of court. Slander isn't slander if it's true. "didn't you just try to sue XXXXX for this same thing?" "Uh, yes judge, I tried to tell you they are ALL out to get me" - "Well, have you paid anyone yet?" - "Uh, no judge, I was told I have to settle all my court cases before I can." - "So, you're suing this person for saying you haven't paid anyone, and can't pay anyone until everyone stops saying you haven't paid anyone" - "That's right sir" - "Well...I suggest you go pay someone"

Don't worry...

[Typo Lad]

My jaw just dropped. I honestly was not expecting a return.

[Rick Olney]

Originally Posted by Matt Doc Martin

As soon as he lists guest, I am contacting them. I will advise them to get payment up front and again, point them to RICK OLNEY'S OWN WORDS. Then, if they choose to go to his "con" (not that it will happen anyhow), it is on them alone. They will be informed.

Again, you've made some very bold and untrue claims. The lines of opinion were crossed here long ago. So, as the various actions on my side of this move forward and one by one the 'fruits' drop off the lie and smear tree here ... we'll indeed see who was truthful and factual versus shooting their mouth off.

Yeah, I'm slummin' ... figured I drop in and read a little. Heh. What losers you all are to allow yourselves to fall to heor worship and be sucked into legal problems by the "professionals" in this message thread and locked in with the UNSCREWED project.

Hard lesson coming for a bunch of you, folks...

[Rick Olney]

Originally Posted by Typo Lad

My jaw just dropped. I honestly was not expecting a return.

You of all people should know better! ;)

[NatGertler]

Originally Posted by Rick Olney

Don't worry...

Oh, I think people here have plenty of reason not to worry when it comes to you, "Rick".

[Gail Simone]

Originally Posted by Rick Olney

Good. You'll need to produce them at some point and time.

Ten years of empty threats, deadbeat.

No one's scared of you. You're hilarious, but you're not scary.

As I said, at the con, you were the joke of the industry.

Gail

[Typo Lad]

Mr. Olney,

To be up front, I am one of the editors working on UNSCREWED. I have no horse in this race other than wanting to give creators who say they were not paid a chance to get thier work out. It has nothing to do with you, as a person, and despite what you may believe is not a "Come, let us mock Rick Olney" deal.

It is about raising money for those awaiting payment. If those people were paid, UNSCREWED would, I suspect, go away tomorrow.

I hope you understand that.

[Gail Simone]

Originally Posted by Rick Olney

Again, you've made some very bold and untrue claims. The lines of opinion were crossed here long ago. So, as the various actions on my side of this move forward and one by one the 'fruits' drop off the lie and smear tree here ... we'll indeed see who was truthful and factual versus shooting their mouth off.

Yeah, I'm slummin' ... figured I drop in and read a little. Heh. What losers you all are to allow yourselves to fall to heor worship and be sucked into legal problems by the "professionals" in this message thread and locked in with the UNSCREWED project.

Hard lesson coming for a bunch of you, folks...

Bring it on, deadbeat.

:)

Gail

[Typo Lad]

Originally Posted by Rick Olney

You of all people should know better! ;)

I'm sorry, but I don't quite understand that.

"I of all people?"

My sole interaction with you had been in this thread, trying to get answers to questions. I believe that I have been nothing but fair and respectful, despite claims made by people I consider personal friends.

If you could please explain what you are implying by that, it would be appreciated.

[Rick Olney]

Originally Posted by TonyIsabella

I'm so proud



I'm not going to respond to him, of course, but it's once again clear that he's talking without benefit of a lawyer.

It's not libel to express one's opinion, direct readers to a website where they can get details of a situation, and to caution readers against doing business with someone. All constitutionally-protected speech.

And, as I've said elsewhere and maybe even here, I hereby grant permission for anyone to repost my warning in the venues available to them.

I'm continuing to get grateful e-mails from folks who had not been priviously aware of Olney, so there remains a need to spread the word.

Tony

Tony,
Your opinion of me is your own and your right. But when coupled with online mob mentality and interlaced with ethic as to your cause for concern when this side of the matter doesn't concern or involve you ... far as I know ... then the ethic you're employing has been changed. Don't believe me? Ask your lawyer. Explain to him exactly what you've said and done and allow him to ask you real questions.

[Rick Olney]

Originally Posted by Gail Simone

Bring it on, deadbeat.

:)

Gail

"Gail" ... be sure to keep your sheep shears sharpened. You'll be needing them sooner than you think to earn a living.