Some of the talk in the Thunderbird III thread got me thinking about Sage. She (along with Emma) is one of the few new members of the X-Men who has stuck in recent years. She may not be with the team currently, but she served with them for some time and there isn't a sense that she's likely to disappear into limbo and never be seen prominently again, as there is with characters like Lifeguard and Cecilia Reyes. She feels, I think, like a real X-Man.
So, it can be said that Sage is a success and, on the surface, you could argue that this is because she already had a history in the X-world as Tessa, Xavier's spy in the Hellfire Club. However, she was by no means a major character before joining the team as Sage and received little serious character development as Tessa. It strikes me that Sage works as an X-Man because she has a strong personality, unusual powers, and has developed interesting relationships with other X-Men that are unconnected to her past and, I think, that's the reason she's a success as a character.
So, do you think I'm right? And therefore does that mean that new characters can be introduced into the X-Men successfully and that the Thunderbird III/Lifeguard/Slipstream/Maggot etc pattern of new characters failing is just coincidence? Or do you disagree? Would we have been accepting of Sage if we didn't already know her as Tessa?


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks