can anyone tell me what the ps4 will offer to warrant a $430 price tag?
i mean it doesn't seem like it's gonna offer much beyond the ps3, and the lack of cell makes it cheaper to manufacture, right?
i don't see why it should cost more than the current ps3.
I feel the same way. I'm sticking with PC games for now.
First of all at this the price is just a rumor, they hadn't officially announce a price. Second there's still some specs they hadn't told us, like how big the hard drive is, rater or not is the eye toy 4 is included, etc... What they have told us is that the PS4 will 8g of memory (which is 16x of what the PS3 has), an AMD 8-core chip from their upcoming "Jaguar" line (so we really don't know how much it cost (much less vs the "Cell" chip)).
Also Sony has said that somehow the PS4 will be able to play 4k video and all PS4 games will be true 1088p (PS3 games are upscale 1080p).
And the Dualshock4 has a lot more going on (like that touch pad they gloss over) than the Dualshock3.
Broadcast OTA = Free TV
Basic Cable = Low Cost TV
Premium Cable = Mid Cost TV
PPV = High Cost TV
OK!?!
Wild Card
My DVDs
The new Xbox, at least went it comes to games, sounds like it's going to be pretty good. The guy who leaked some info on "Durango" (and whose house was raided by the FBI and Australian police not long ago) said he played some of the new Xbox games, and described the graphical leap from the current-gen consoles, like: Going from playing Halo 2 on an original Xbox to playing Crysis on a powerful PC.
I don't ecpect too much graphically from the upcoming generation. I think we've hit the point of diminishing returns, and nothing in the Playstation conference really suggested otherwise. Killzone looked more colorful, but not technically better than the current Killzones. The Capcom game was the only one that looked like it was pushing beyond current gen. Also, with the Vita sales what they are the off-tv play on it seems doomed from the start. With the WiiU doing it out of the box and not with an extra $250 peripheral that no one has that seems like the console to go with if you're interested in that kind of thing.
The online stuff looks really good though. I'll probably end up with PC for multiplats and Nintendo for exclusives for price reasons. But I don't see the PS4 failing like the Vita or stumbling out of the gate as badly as the PS3 did in 06.
Going by the guy who had access to the new Xbox, it sounds like the upcoming generation is going to have a huge graphical leap. Although that new Killzone didn't seem like anything crazy; it was better looking than the last Killzone, but it didn't seem any better than Crysis 3.
I'm also not sure what the hell they were doing with that demo of Killzone, it just made me think of the old Halo 2 demo and the start of Half-Life 2.
http://playeressence.com/ps4-to-ps-v...es/#more-16766
All PlayStation 4 titles must support PS Vita remote-play functionality, with the only exception that games that use the PS4 Eye Camera don’t have to.
Sony Computer Entertainment boss Shuhei Yoshida confirmed this on Twitter.
“Yes, it’s true unless the game requires specific hardware like the camera,” he said.. “It will be great to play PS4 games on PS Vita.”
The feature is very similar to what’s on the Wii U right now with off screen play. Does this feature make the PS Vita more appealing to any of you guys?
Source
Couldn't give a damn about release titles. Those'll come in time. Will it play offline?
Bookmarks