So they made a book about Clint Barton who is in the movies which would make the book a hit based on your logic. And somehow, it is Kate Bishop who is carrying the book even though he does not have a movie and she is starring in a team book that is selling less than Barton?
And your scientific basis for that are tumblr posts from rabid fans.
WOW! I would love to show this thread to my statistics class on how to NOT make inference. WOW.



Reply With Quote

. You can't even compare the two, they aren't remotely similar (at least from the little I read). Plus it sucked. This is a totally different read. Kate wasn't my gateway, she wasn't my friends gateway, and from the looks of it she wasn't the gateway for the people that have responded to you.

Bookmarks