Why go cgi when you have Thor being played by a real actor?
Why go cgi when you have Thor being played by a real actor?
Irene Adler: “I would have you right here on this desk until you begged for mercy twice.”
Sherlock: “I’ve never begged for mercy in my life.”
Irene: “Twice.”
I'll say, it depends.
Like others here, I don't see any real reason that WW can't work in live action. And I'd love to see a well doen, live action WW movie(s) and/or tv series.
At the same time, I'd also like to see more superheroes done along the lines of "The Incredibles." Not everything needs to be live action, imo. So, in that sense, I think cgi/animation could work well for WW (movie and/or animated series).
eta -
Some Numbers Food for Thought re. Animation - Worldwide boxoffice (in US $)
60 Kung Fu Panda 2 $665.7
61 Ice Age: The Meltdown $655.4
64 Kung Fu Panda $631.7
65 The Incredibles $631.4
69 Iron Man 2 $623.9
77 Tangled $590.7
81 Iron Man $585.2
87 Puss in Boots $554.7
96 Brave $535.4
97 Madagascar $532.7
107 How to Train Your Dragon $494.9
109 Clash of the Titans (2010) $493.2
112 Rio $484.6
114 Shrek $484.4
127 X-Men: The Last Stand Fox $459.4
129 Gladiator $457.6
132 300 $456.1
134 Thor $449.3
156 Batman $411.3
159 X2: X-Men United $407.7
169 Superman Returns $391.1
173 Happy Feet $384.3
182 Batman Begins $374.2
185 X-Men Origins: Wolverine $373.1
source: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/
Note: I not saying animation is the best option; just pointing out that I believe it's a viable option and something worth thinking about.
Last edited by americanwonder; 02-10-2013 at 01:44 PM.
"... Act, that each tomorrow find us farther than today."
- Longfellow
If its an actual live action film, a CGI Wonder Woman is a stupid idea. It perpetuates the false idea that superhero characters for some reason are hard to cast. Its not nearly that difficult. In the cases of characters who are otherwise very humanoid or altogether alien in appearance though, that's a different story.
Last edited by Sacred Knight; 02-10-2013 at 01:16 PM.
I remember the first opening to the Justice League cartoon had them all as CGI and worked well. The Green Lantern animated series has done very well with the characters of Ayia and Carol Fenris. I wouldn't mind a CGI film like the Incredibles because it would give them a lot of room to play with. Keep Suesan Isenberg for Diana and that'd be good too.
Let's face it, Wonder Woman -if they ever do make a film- is going to be harder to do than Superman and Batman and the Avengers. The costume is problem number 1. That wouldn't be a problem with animation. But all of the expectations, all of the pre-conceptions and all of the difficulties in deciding what type of Wonder Woman story to make... those are all going to be there in any format.
I think the biggest advantage in a CGI Wonder Woman film is that if you want to do a string over them over a decade you don't have to worry about the actress being called too old to play the part. Cartoons don't age after all.
In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
Thank you.
The article linked to talks about a CGI character in an X-Men live action film. Like Gollum in Lord Of The Rings. Probably somebody like Nightcrawler or blue, cyborged Archangel or whatever.
The technology to do convincing CGI humans in live action films simply doesn't exist.
But the OP is talking about a CGI Wonder Woman in an otherwise live action film. Which is daft.
Last edited by carabas; 02-10-2013 at 01:39 PM.
'The marquis. Well, you know, to be honest, he seems a little bit dodgy to me.'
'Mm,' she agreed. 'He's a little bit dodgy in the same way that rats are a little bit covered in fur."
All I could come up with is the movies Tron & Beowulf.
Just tell me this…Was Herakles my father?
(Hippolyta) http://pg4anna.tripod.com/amazonqueen.wav
http://www.jestersjoker.com/Hercules...ans_Father.pdf
IF everyone was CGI, like in Beowulf, then that's fine.
BUT, I would not want to see a live action movie with actors playing Superman, Batman, Flash and Green Lantern, but a CGI Wonder Woman.
Heck, if they were going to spend that much money on CGI, they could just cast Lucy Lawless as Wonder Woman and de-age her like they did Professor X and Magneto in the terrible X-Men 3.
I have been clamoring for a Wonder Woman or Justice League feature in the animated style below for like EVER! Skip ahead to 00:28 and let the awesome flow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wG7OQ-WqGAQ
Why would Wonder Woman be CGI if the other actors were live-action?![]()
I think an all CGI WW movie could look awesome depending on the conceptual artist the animation is based on. I said in another thread I wouldn't mind if her costume was motion capture/CGI, like in Ironman and Green Lantern as long as it looked right. But having a CGI WW next to an actor playing Supes or Bats would just look awful.
"It is wrong to assume that art needs the spectator in order to be. The film runs on without any eyes. The spectator cannot exist without it. It ensures his existence." -- James Douglas Morrison
After seeing the latest GL-Animated episode with Carol and the Star Saphires I don't think I'd mind a CGI Wonder Woman film or series.
In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
Sure.
If it's a CG animated movie.
If hard work is not another name for talent, it is the best possible substitute for it.
- James Garfield
Bookmarks