Superior Spider-Man #3 *spoilers* and discussion

[Tendrin]

Well with good and caring relatives raising him, he did become evil at first, so I wouldn't be too confident Peters kids would be any different.

I wouldn't say 'evil'. Just not so nice. And why not? Uncle Ben and Aunt May were great, but he was pretty clearly a bullied social outcast. That does have an impact. But, again. I wouldn't say 'evil'. Just... a bit of a jerk.

[Lars C]

I wouldn't say 'evil'. Just not so nice. And why not? Uncle Ben and Aunt May were great, but he was pretty clearly a bullied social outcast. That does have an impact. But, again. I wouldn't say 'evil'. Just... a bit of a jerk.

Yeah. Peter was bullied and reacted immaturely to getting powers. He was absolutely never evil. So no, I don't think any offsprings to Peter, if raised by him, would become villains and absolutely not evil.

[Tendrin]

Yeah. Peter was bullied and reacted immaturely to getting powers. He was absolutely never evil. So no, I don't think any offsprings to Peter, if raised by him, would become villains and absolutely not evil.

(Also, the notions that good or evil are genetically imprinted onto you is pretty offensively wrong, in my book.)

[Lars C]

(Also, the notions that good or evil are genetically imprinted onto you is pretty offensively wrong, in my book.)

Couldn't agree with you more. I just couldn't find a delicate way to put it.

[jackolover]

(Also, the notions that good or evil are genetically imprinted onto you is pretty offensively wrong, in my book.)

The definition of good and evil float about depending on your ethical stance. No doubt the behavior of Superior Spider-Man is not that evil either is it? But we really didn't get to see what Peter turned into, if he was given 12 issues of being the jerk. He may have turned into doc Ock. This is where I am trying to go here. Peter was no saint, so his kids would not be saints either.

[Tendrin]

The definition of good and evil float about depending on your ethical stance. No doubt the behavior of Superior Spider-Man is not that evil either is it? But we really didn't get to see what Peter turned into, if he was given 12 issues of being the jerk. He may have turned into doc Ock. This is where I am trying to go here. Peter was no saint, so his kids would not be saints either.

]
Doh. DOublepost.

[Tendrin]

The definition of good and evil float about depending on your ethical stance. No doubt the behavior of Superior Spider-Man is not that evil either is it? But we really didn't get to see what Peter turned into, if he was given 12 issues of being the jerk. He may have turned into doc Ock. This is where I am trying to go here. Peter was no saint, so his kids would not be saints either.

Again, I think projecting Peter's teenage behavior onto his children is ridiculous. Are you saying that if someone was a little angel, they'd have little angels for children? Do you really see what you're arguing here?

[jade_nova]

Ghost Peter is really the worst thing ever, and I wish someone would exercise him from this comic.

You need Ghost Peter or else would you explain the return of Peter Parker a year or two down the road.

[jackolover]

Again, I think projecting Peter's teenage behavior onto his children is ridiculous. Are you saying that if someone was a little angel, they'd have little angels for children? Do you really see what you're arguing here?

Character traits? Yes I see character traits will come through.

[Mysterio4521]

They knocked this usse out of the park!

[TheOther]

Well with good and caring relatives raising him, he did become evil at first, so I wouldn't be too confident Peters kids would be any different.

I don't think you know what that word means. Sure he was a jerk. But he wasn't evil.