I'm not intentionally following you. You and I just happen to be in the same Superman related topics.
You really don't pay attention. First off, I never said that anything before 1986 was garbage. Just because it isn't my cup of tea, doesn't mean that it was crap. Second, I don't support the New 52, something that my position has been well documented on here. Just because I don't bitch like Lexrules does, doesn't mean that I'm in favor of it. What I do say though, is that it's DC's right to do what they wish because it is their property. Same with Marvel. My support, or lack thereof, is frivolous compared to my belief over creator or owner rights. Third, DC and Marvel have always had a habit of changing their characters looks and origins to best suit what they want to do. Even with the knowledge of the creators and regardless of their blessing. Spider-Man alone has had multiple costume changes in the comics and in animation, it has happened as well. Not to mention the films. But I don't see you bitching about that.And no, if Shuster had changed the costume I of course would have no issue with it because it is his creation and I always respect the wishes of the characters creator. I find you to be a DC shill because you support everything they do and question nothing, unless of course it is in their past, in which case you consider it all to be garbage.
Indeed. Yet, I don't see a complaint about those alterations. But alter Superman and it's "Man the torpedoes!". That's the hypocrisy.Originally Posted by Lancerman



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks