
Originally Posted by
Hrist
Have you read much of Natasha's canon outside the past few years? I don't disagree with you, but Clint isn't just a guy. They weren't together in the film, but they have been very serious in the comics. Clint asked Natasha to marry him, she defected Russia while he was her partner, and that relationship helped give her the strength to do that. The "work wife" term isn't accurate, because Natasha and Clint never had an extended working partnership. But they did have a torrid affair and were an item for many years. It's not like that came out of nowhere all of a sudden when the Avengers film came out, (unlike Bucky's past with Natasha which actually was a retcon.) Bendis has touched on Clint and Natasha's history quite a bit before, having them react like exes when they were on separate teams post Civil War, or when he killed Clint in Disassembled and had Natasha and Steve shown as, you know, the Avengers that matter most to him.
That's, to me, the context you have to read that scene in, not just "Clint is with Jess, Natasha is with Bucky."
Clint and Natasha are exes who still care about each other deeply, that's interesting soap opera stuff, idk why a book that stars them both wouldn't touch on it. They're also two people who make impulsive romantic choices that complicate their own love lives. I don't think that Natasha just goes flitting off with other guys while she is in a committed relationship, but whatever she had with Clint it wasn't, and still isn't just flitting. I don't think they meant to kiss each other, Natasha clearly immediately regretted it. But sometimes you get caught up in a vulnerable moment and things get confused, especially with someone who you were once in love with and still close to. The problem with the scene Bendis wrote was that, while I think that was kind of the dynamic he was shooting for, he didn't convey it very clearly, nor did he contextualize it well in terms of Natasha and Clint. That's been the problem with Bendis and Clint/Jess, too, there's potential for a dynamic there but the way Bendis writes them it seems like they're just making out a lot for no reason.
But I don't really get how one IC mistake totally steps all over the work Brubaker has done? If Brubaker wanted he could easily have Natasha confess to Bucky how she kissed another guy in the heat of the moment but immediately regretted it, because, even if she couldn't say so at the time, it just made her remember how much she'd rather be with him. Or, much more likely, he could just ignore it and we the readers could join him in ignoring it. It's not like the kiss blossomed into a continued flirtation; just the opposite, Natasha broke it off pretty strongly. For all Bendis is concerned that was the end of it. Brubaker was completely free to break them up his own way! Maybe Bendis even asked Brubaker if he could write it, idk, but he definitely had to go through an editor and it's really their job to coordinate this stuff, no??
Bookmarks