As a fan who personally LOVED the Thanos storyline, and who has not enjoyed Humphries' run on Ultimates at all, I will be seriously put off if he somehow jams Thanos back into the Ultimate universe.
Thanos' storyline in the UU is complete, it's done, it's a completely circular story and it's perfect that way. I really don't want anyone to ruin that.
Also can I point out how unoriginal it feels to have hints of Thanos as a villain right after his reveal at the end of a certain movie? Really?
It's gotten to the point where Ultimates is the last comic I read from my monthly pile, when it used to be the first. (Oddly enough now Hickman's Avengers is first, it's amazing, and makes me sad he left Ultimates).
I'm closer to dropping Ultimates now than ever.
"Predictable? If there were any more plot twists going on, we'd need M. Night Shyamalan to randomly appear at the end saying 'What a twist' before vanishing". - Kurolegacy on Ult X-Men #8.
"The Victory is in the Preparation." - Damian Wayne/Batman My Blog
I'm excited to see what Humphries will do with an Infinity Gauntlet, and the reasoning for 4 gems vs the standard 6.
I have a few questions that I can't answer myself due to being at work that maybe some of you fellas/ladies know off the top of your head.
1. Did Thanos die at the end of his story or was he just banished back to his home planet?
2. Thanos supposedly died and came back to life (and was more powerful each time) repeatedly so do we need to include him more when talking about how "dead means dead" isn't real in the UU?
1) Find a bad guy
2) Be Wolverine
Ultimate Wolverine is coming back, sort of!
I don't remember if he died or not, but the story ended with him finding the cube 10,000 (I think) years in the past, after Reed threw it back in time. But in the "present," as it were, I don't think he died.
I put him with Thor... it's established in his backstory that he does this.2. Thanos supposedly died and came back to life (and was more powerful each time) repeatedly so do we need to include him more when talking about how "dead means dead" isn't real in the UU?
The more we talk about Thanos, the more I wish that Pasqual Ferry would come back and draw this arc of the Ultimates. Few things could make me happier.
I like Ultimate Comics. - Read them with us!
I also buy: Captain America, Avengers, FF, New Avengers, X-Factor, among others
The combine power of the Soul and Reality Gem can bring people back from the dead right?
He died. Reed removed the Cubes "defense mechanism", so it could make even subconscious wishes and desires true. In Thanos' case, it was to be with death, a death-wish if you like. And that, I think, meant that he died without the means to return.
Of course it's a CBR thread, so that means that one mention of Thanos makes him already part of this story.
I would also love to see the day when somebody is required to have an actual proof, like a quote from the writer, to go along with "it's obvious that Humphries really doesn't care about the Ultimate line", or suffer the consequences. Sadly though I don't believe the world will turn for the better.
Its not intention, its style. His style of writing isn't suited for this type of book. Reading Humphries' Ultimates is like watching a horror film written by Mr Rogers. There's nothing wrong with Mr Rogers, but horror films aren't his thing.
As for the whole Infinity thing, I'm so glad they're doing an Infinity story, but at the same time, PLEASE have someone else write it. I've been looking forward to the eventual Ultimate Infinity storyline since I started reading Ultimate. I wonder if the Gauntlet will work differently in this universe. I mean, there's "dead means dead" and then there's this weapon that allows you to do anything like bring people back to life.
Last edited by CaptainMarvell; 01-04-2013 at 10:53 AM.
Pull List: Uncanny X-Men, Ultimates, New Avengers, Cable and the X-Force, Hunger
Exactly my point. Back when Tony went to her, it seemed like a matter of going to someone who had been in the superhero community so they wouldn't get turned in (plus Reed was the villain so it kinda made sense). Since then, she's been everywhere despite basically claiming to be tired of the super hero thing. Heck her little brother was found injured and staring on the streets and she hasn't bat an eyelash. She's never been close to the Ultimates yet now it's like she's been their best friend forever. Falcon I can understand. Carol Danvers I can understand. Sue Storm, not so much.
Holding out for a Peter/Miles team up.
It's his style? Style requires substance. But without nitpicking over eachother's choice of words, I think his "style" would be more suited for a Saturday morning cartoon or a children's book like Power Pack. But first he has to learn the characters. His current characterisation on The Ultimates has felt very wooden and one-note. You say it's a particular style. I call it bad writing.
:)
Last edited by Robbie_Jee; 01-04-2013 at 08:18 PM.
2000-2006: Golden Age of the UU
2007-2009: Age of Loebotomy
2009-2011: Post-Ultimatum Era
2011-????: Silver Age of the UU
"The Victory is in the Preparation." - Damian Wayne/Batman My Blog
That seems pretty harsh. I'm not really into what Humphries is doing, but that's more because I find it mediocre and kind of clunky. With Loeb, it was mind-boggling how something so awful and bizarre ever even saw print. I can at least understand what Humphries is trying to do, even if it isn't very good. With Loeb, my reaction was less "I'm bored by this" than it was "Are you out of your MIND?!"
Damn it, guess Ultimates will be off my pull list for much longer. Humphries run on the title has been lackluster, dropped it after the second issue, and haven't heard good things since.
Pull List:Action,Animal Man,SSM,Avengers(Reg,New,Uncanny),Batman Books,Cap,Daredevil,GL,Hulk,JL(reg,America,Dark),S wamp Thing,Winter Soldier and X-Men.
Bookmarks