Well, on the Batman threads I see people saying they think they are being treated "disrespectfully" by DC creators because they don't agree with some of the changes being made; I see some Justice League fans saying Johns has no idea what he's doing and the book is terrible, too.
There will always be such people, I think.
Observe, Orient, Decide, Act
Spock was taking a shower in that panel.
There are several ways to read that scene.
The whole New Avengers concept, which made the current team possible, is controversial.
Kirkman pissed off a lot of people with his call for more creator-owned comics.
Saga sells pretty well, but it's not on the level of the other titles. We're currently ten issues into an R-rated science fiction series. Since readers pick up the title knowing that, it diminishes much of the controversy. Readers also haven't formed attachments to the characters to the extent that a death/ decision by characters would be controversial.
In Justice League, there are plenty of people pissed off at Superman and Wonder Woman's romance, as well as the invalidation of previous continuity.
Aquaman's a B-level character, so Johns has more freedom. If anyone at CBR is pissed off about the treatment of the character, he won't find many who feel passionately one way or the other.
Batman is universally acclaimed, although it may not be a good idea to say that a book is uncontroversial the issue before a major crossover comes to an end.
McKenstry those with the most opinions often have the fewest facts.
Barack Obama There's not a liberal America and a conservative America - there's the United States of America.
Christopher Yost Cyclops = Awesome and Right, while Xavier = USELESS JERK-O! Viva la Cyclops!
Facts are the enemy of truth.
You gonna get us out of here. With that tight-ass Wolverine outfit on. Now, let's make it happen, asshole
YOST: Okay, it's not Jean Grey. Nobody likes her
Check out the O.A.W. Report at www.majinoaw.blogspot.com. You want to see why I say the things I do or understand what's in my head... this is the place to go.
I know Kevin Nichols through a guy that knows a gal. Small world!
If nihilism didn't take some delight in destruction one might suspect nihilists were an unnaturally morbid sort.
-Theophilus
I can well understand the overblown fan reaction to some of the recent controversies, even if death threats and the like are unwarranted. Comic book fans are seen as an obsessive lot sometimes, but i think its more to do with the nature of the medium than the reader. The medium elicits it; in the sense that unlike any other, people follow the exploits of a character for years to the point where they feel real. The reader has something invested in it more than other forms of entertainment and so it really hurts when writers mess around with characters too much. Of course writers play to this because inflaming passions sells. You can understand that when we're talking about a medium that doesn't make alot of money in itself and the writers are as concerned about it dying out as the readers. So publishers out of desperation to ensure the survival of comics do and say what the can to sell more and readers out of desperation spew on internet forums and make death threats.
I think some of the mocking is a defence mechanism against the sheer volume of vitriol their stories can attract these days with the internet, but i would prefer to be trolled and then relieved to find peter parker didn't really die, and otto didn't really get it on with mj, then to be screwed by surprise and for real like with OMD (ok not such a surprise).
i dont see too many death threats being handed out to the x-men writers. Again, Spider-man seems to be a special scenario. Similar.... but not the exact same as what youve given as examples.
Marvel knows its fans are over the top when it comes to spidey, so they market to that.
Bookmarks