I wish there was a more interesting conversation being had. this one's pretty boring.
the problem is to "fix" what a lot of people think are outdated or obsolete business models of media and digital distribution
the US has its copyright laws, so do the UK, the problem is the large scale bootlegging happens in other countries and you can't stop or prosecute that....its this grey area and the countries that are getting their media stolen are the ones who are trying to deal with it...primarily the US
so the only thing the US can really do is modify the current copyright protection laws and attempt to put out the fires they can get to
Support your local roller derby league
the problem for me is shitty content. most of the movies I've seen by less than legal means, I'm glad I didn't pay for. they weren't worth paying for. most of the movies I've paid for were worth paying for and I don't have a problem with a single penny spent.
make better product and people will pay for it. there's always goign to be teenagers who're going to pirate material, due to lack of funds, or just not caring/understanding, but most adults will pay for things they genuinely like. stop asking me to pay for a shitty boring remake of Total Recall. Ask me to pay instead for Upstream Color and I'll happily plunk down the $15 to see it in the theatre, and buy the DVD.
but that is entirely subjective...what is "good" and what is "bad"...I thought Moonrise Kingdom was pretentious garbage, but I paid to see it
when work is produced, regardless of its quality, it is sill copyrighted material
how can you base any sort of rational argument about the pros and cons of copyright law on quality, a matter that is entirely different from person to person?
Support your local roller derby league
I wasn't basing a rational argument on anything. I was simply stating my personal opinion that if you make good product, you'll be rewarded.
there's no subjectivity to the piece of shit that was Battleship, or Total Recall. they were just bad.
Moonrise Kingdom is... it's a specific thing. it's well made in every regard, but taste is taste. so...
all I was saying, is that I'll happily pay for a quality product. I'll go out of my way to pay for it.
I just tried Hulu and it wouldn't work since I live in Canada. Too bad.
I do agree with you, so many options to watch shows that TV shouldn't have to worry about piracy.
Is media piracy such a big concern other than North America? Do places like Japan and China worry about people downloading the countrie's movies and tv shows? I've read that a lot of Japanese people download Manga yet sales are very successful.
but if almost all tv is available to watch for free on so many sites, what does it matter if someone just torrents it instead?
and yes, I get the ad placement/commercials, but isn't that a large part of why people are torrenting tv to begin with?
I was present for a Comcast meeting with advertisers and they talked about their plans to put even more ads into the programming over the next five years. more. I fucking hate commercials. I get the need for it, but I'd buy a digital subscription to a show if I just got a download at air time and it didn't have ads.
remember the part where I said I get that?
I'm just talking. I'm just putting ideas out there. there's a conversation to be had about why people are downloading instead. Hulu was great until they just made it regular tv. now I don't use it. also, I had to create an account to watch a "mature" program. I could torrent it faster than it would take to create an account. that same show is on television and I don't need to create an account to watch it.
I think a modified subscription service would work....each network or company has their own sub service and you can pay by month or for the year...kind of similar to how Xbox Live is set up and you get shows a day or so after air
Support your local roller derby league
Some people's budgets are so tight, that they feel the need to resort to other means. Others want to spend their money elsewhere.Originally Posted by Plawsky
Which is no different than when people would borrow someone else's copy of the album and record what they wanted, something I used to do back in the day, so they wouldn't have to buy it. As well as record off the radio, which dates back to the invention of the cassette tape. Then there was dubbing VHS films with two VCR's, which a lot of people did. The invention of the blank cassettes, DVD-R's and CD-R's made this a reality. And of course, borrowing your friend's video game so that you can play it and beat the game, without having to spend a dime. There's that old chestnut.That money you've saved for yourself at the library is no different than downloading movies. I agree - saving money is awesome - but that doesn't make it any more legal or right.
Support your local roller derby league
I agree, and I do my best to avoid it. I dislike having to just not go on the internet because everyone is going "OH NO DALE!!!!" or some shit on my twitter feed, or facebook. there's only so much one can do.
but again, I'm just sussing out possible reasons people are torrenting. it isn't because "they're all criminals" either.
that Louis CK things? $5 for several downloads and streaming on the site? he made over a million bucks in a weekend. and sure, there were torrents out there. those people weren't going to buy it anyway, so whatever. but the torrenting was pretty minimal, I understand. he put a product out with the consumer in mind, and people bought it. I'll buy all of his releases if he keeps doing it that way. I could have just as easily not paid $5 and gotten the same file. why did so many people support that release? they certainly didn't have to.
never mind the world famous, and wildly successful artists who support torrents of their own work, and have even put them out themselves because a sales spike always follows.
remember when the cassette tape was going to ruin the record industry?
Bookmarks