It just seems so....dumb.
Stan Lee said the success was not Spider-Man's super powers, but it was really the man behind the mask that makes the whole thing work
There is a reason Dr. Ock doesn't have his own monthly comic. because not enough people will buy it. So why is it different because Doc Ock cosplays as Spider-man?
not many care about the character of Ock other than as a villain.
It's like Dan forgot the key factor to the comic is not the masked "menace" Spider-man...But Peter Parker.
The world was blessedly free of honest men and wonderfully full of people who believed they could tell the difference between an honest man and a crook. -Terry Pratchett
Stan Lee Burn.
I know Kevin Nichols through a guy that knows a gal. Small world!
If nihilism didn't take some delight in destruction one might suspect nihilists were an unnaturally morbid sort.
In my opinion is implied in every post. Please make an effort to remember that.
I don't doubt Dan's Spidey-fandom. I'd have more interest in this story if 1) Peter Parker went out on a good note(I don't think he could have went out WORSE than he did), and 2) the last year of ASM wasn't so mediocre("No Turning Back" aside)
But I guess we'll see what they got planned. At least give the first story arc a try, right?