Even I know two or three.Originally Posted by king mob;16374713[B
agreedI think we need people like Rich who will poke and prod so they can get stories that the likes of CBR would avoid because it might ruin their cosy relationship with the Big Two but if Rich is really sitting on something this big, he needs to get it properly sourced and run with it otherwise he's as bad as all those Fleet Street editors who spent years not printing the Savile story.
we have a growing generation of people who are getting into media and journalism because they are fans and want to keep their access, not people who are genuinely curious and want the truth of things
I started reading up on the Jimmy Seville thing and I was just appaled, just by how many people were complicit in the coverup and the massive amount of people affected
Support your local roller derby league
Last edited by Iangould; 12-28-2012 at 01:53 PM.
Second, not sure if that would be considered worse than Jan Harps' conviction for multiple sexual assaults on minors.
What could *possibly* be in a senior executive's past that would be so bad that it would destroy their subsequent employers? Shy of the company knocking off victims and/or witnesses to the prior offense(s), I'm having trouble fathoming any conceivable actions that could be so severe (and in that case, the destructive thrust of the story would still be primarily concerned with the illegal/immoral actions of the company, not just the sordid past of the executive).
Last edited by Loren; 12-28-2012 at 03:56 PM.
Last edited by Iangould; 12-28-2012 at 04:15 PM.
Stan Lee's in the clear unless he was a really terrible toddler.