Yes. I believe a rape will take place in the pages of Superior Spider-Man.
No. I don't believe a rape will take place in the pages of Superior Spider-Man.
I believe rape already occurred in Amazing Spider-Man 700: Doc Ock/Peter kissed MJ.
Ive seen TV shows, movies & comics where kisses happen due to mistaken identities & its not rape.
Last edited by charlesthehammer; 12-29-2012 at 12:14 PM.
Yeah, I'm thinking that, the way this could play out, MJ beings noticing little things that seem very off about "Peter," things she initially dismissed as him being overly eager for them to get back together and/or stress from Silver Sable's death and "Doc Ock's" escape and so-forth. Things that make her concerned, but nothing she thinks is too serious. And then, depending upon how the upcoming Massacre story in Superior Spider-Man plays out, that's when MJ begins to think "Okay, something is seriously wrong here, and I have to find out what it is." And of course, she doesn't directly confront "Peter" but begins looking for help from Peter's allies like Captain America, Iron Man, and Dr. Strange without "Peter" being aware of it.
Blog: Yes, I Am STILL a Nerd!
Don't ever take a fence down until you know the reason why it was put up.--G.K. Chesterton
You would hope so, but the fact is it is Marvel after all, and going by what they've done in the past they might not even care.
It appears that Marvel doesn't want Peter and Mary Jane to be a couple despite the fact that a lot of fans want them to be.
Can we really put it past Marvel to do something like this as a final nail in the coffin to prevent them from ever being a couple again should Peter end up returning as some people have already stated in this thread?
Heck, I find it even impossibe for Peter and Mary Jane to remain close friends if Doc Ock and her get sexually involved with each other and she later learns the truth.
Last edited by Spider-Fly; 12-29-2012 at 12:40 PM.
Oh yeah, it's pretty much what I expected. More controversy and rage keeps the discussion going. I'll only say that the final shoe has yet to drop. And supposedly Kaine has some connection to all this...future solicits point to the other.
Is it me, or do Mj and Pete look kinda...hard in the face? Weird.
She is surprised there, but the true test is what happens in the issue. But based on past work I'm not certain she'll pull back.
In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
I didn't think much about that at first, but I would chalk it up to she was surprised he was wearing the Spider-Man outfit after going through all the obvious trouble to attempt to get her in bed. Got all her favorite things, said they were getting back together, and then......Spider-Man outfit underneath. Especially since after the nonsense that is OMIT Spider-Man was the primary reason they broke up in the first place.
I don't think she's suspicious of anything more severe than him having some emotional troubles. Consider the scene later on when she gave him the long-winded I love you speech and then made out with him. If she was suspicious of his behavior, that would be the time to question him.
That said, it's not impossible. One theory of how things will get back to normal would be Mary Jane figuring it all out. But I don't think that's the most likely explanation given the evidence we have at the moment.
What it always boils down to is trust. You're analysis of the problem isn't wrong. But we simply don't trust that Marvel feels the same way. This is the same comic book franchise that has, in the last decade, put out a sloppy character redefining story that is clearly the most out of character story ever told about that character, had its protagonist make a deal with the notDevil to erase a marriage sheerly out of personal preference, and whose master plan to keep Spider-man from getting married was to have an ordinary criminal throw a cinder block at him and succeed. Further complicating the matter is ASM 603, where we see the Chameleon dressed as Peter Parker seeming play a game of hide the sausage with Michele Gonzales only to have to hastily backpedal months later while simultaneously pretending nothing is wrong.
Adding another layer to the problem is the fact that we've been outright told that Spider-Man and Mary Jane Watson will be getting back together. Thirty....Fifty years ago, that might not have had the sexual implications, but in the modern world, that's generally what it means. Of course, that could be a lie or misdirection, or it could simply be referring to the stuff we've already seen. But it's out there, regardless, making people doubt.
Simply put, yes, it would be a stupid decision. That seems to be the way things work anymore though.
Welcome to the World of Art brought to you by Humberto Ramos. He does draw some great female anatomy, but he always gives them (and the men) chins that would make the Tick jealous.
Last edited by Xenon; 12-29-2012 at 02:17 PM.
When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up.-C.S.Lewis
There is a good chance resident Mary Sue Carlie will figure it out.
It's convoluted to discuss a scene that hasn't happened yet, and may not happen, considering the other ways the story can go.
But I think one problem with this discussion is the expectation that everyone would agree that something that isn't legally classified as rape in New York state is an example of that crime, and therefore off-limits in a Spider-Man comic. It's too restrictive in this type of series when readers start suggesting that something that isn't technically illegal in the state, and that can't happen in the real world in exactly the same way is a taboo that shouldn't even be hinted at.
Because legality is a dumb way to decide morality. Damn near useless really. I mean racism isn't illegal, but I don't think having Peter going around calling Arabs towel heads (or insert fictional race here) is a very good idea.
Another example is pot. Its illegal in a lot of places, but I don't care if its discussed in any book.
Last edited by charlesthehammer; 12-29-2012 at 04:52 PM.
Bookmarks