Results 1 to 15 of 31

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Mild-Mannered Reporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    29,047

    Default DC Promotes Harras To SVP, Kanalz To Vertigo

    DC Comics made shifts in its executive structure today as Editor-in-Cheif Bob Harras earned an SVP addition to his title while DC digital honcho Hank Kanalz will now lead Vertigo with an eye on integrating the imprint across the company.


    Full article here.

  2. #2
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    221B Baker Street
    Posts
    18,005

    Default

    Why, DC, why.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    324

    Default

    “Bob is a respected and talented editor, manager and leader with a keen eye for talent,” said DC Comics Co-Publisher Dan DiDio. “He’s been integral to making DC – The New 52 the amazing success it is today. 2013 is going to build upon 2012’s huge successes and we continue to be committed to providing fans with the best comics on the stands. Bob and his team have set the bar high for themselves, and we are all excited about what’s next for DC Comics.”
    Keep telling yourself that DiDio. How did the whole Rob Liefeld experience go? How about writers and artists leaving DC to work for other companies with NEW and ORIGINAL concepts? How about firing creators for no reason? I could go on.

    DC Entertainment veteran Hank Kanalz has been named Senior Vice President of Vertigo and Integrated Publishing. In his new role, Kanalz will oversee Vertigo’s publishing efforts
    Really? WHY? stupid on many levels.
    Who's there?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Phantom Roxas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    On the one hand, I think I could enjoy watching DC collapse in on itself.

    Then again, I just want stories I can actually enjoy.

  5. #5
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    221B Baker Street
    Posts
    18,005

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nightwing1982 View Post
    Keep telling yourself that DiDio. How did the whole Rob Liefeld experience go? How about writers and artists leaving DC to work for other companies with NEW and ORIGINAL concepts? How about firing creators for no reason? I could go on.
    Pretty standard PR bullshit.

    DC is really ticking me to no end now.

  6. #6

    Default

    The main shift I want to see within DC's executive structure involve Harras resigning. Or getting the sack.

    Well, I dunno. Was this promotion just to get him further away from the actual creative process? I could deal with that.

  7. #7

    Default

    Replacing Karen Berger with Hank Kanalz is like firing Alfred Hitchcock off a film and hiring Brett Ratner to replace him.
    I believe all that needs to be said has been. So here’s my two cents.”
    -- ScottMC, inadvertently summing up the Internet.

  8. #8
    Senior Member passer-by's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    3,186

    Default

    Harras was the guy who had Chris Claremont leave the X-Men in 1991 after writing the title for 16 years (a Marvel record, I think), because he liked better the ideas of pencilers Jim Lee and Whilce Portacio. That's all I need to know about him.
    Last edited by passer-by; 12-21-2012 at 11:33 AM.

  9. #9
    New Member Drumanespic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    London, U.K.
    Posts
    68

    Default

    I think this is a bad day for DC Comics. Unfortunately, they think Bob Harras is doing a good job. I suggest that if you look closely, successes are occurring in spite of him, not because of him. As for his negative influence, I submit as evidence the disaster zones that are DC's 'youth' titles & the Superman titles. Both are editorial & commercial failures.

    The wave of 'hand-me-down' talent he imported has also been a failiure. Rob Liefeld any one? Remember, Bob Harras is the man behind the decision to let Rob Liefeld co-write 3 x DC titles! Whilst Gail Simone was restricted to 1 x title, then rudely booted off it. I wonder if the subsequent back-tracking was imposed on Bob? My instinct says yes.

    Whilst the new52 is an overall success, the foundations are quite weak, largely due to them rushing the execution & the launch.

    I believe Bob Harras is inflicting long-lasting damage to this publisher. I dislike the direction he's taking, along with the management style he seems to bring with it. He is quite simply a bad editor.

    But, hey, it's the end of a good year for DC in spite of the problems. I just don't believe that measure of good luck can continue.

  10. #10

    Default

    DC Promotes Harras To SVP

    Bad news at the end of the year.

    This is it.
    I think that DC Comics fans are officially f#%ucked.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •