
Originally Posted by
berk
I haven't been folowing the series enough to understand what's been done, but splitting up the aegis sounds like a dumb idea to me. This is the problem I always have with all the various takes on Wonder Woman: I get interested because I'm interested in Greek mythology, but then I'm always disappointed by what the poor judgement shown in how they make use of that incredibly rich source material.
As for WW wielding the thunderbolt, I really hope not - you might as well make her a full-blown goddess and head of the pantheon and have done with it - but I think that in raising that idea you touch on something I've noticed before: they never really know what to do with Athena because so many of that goddess's attributes have been transferred to WW herself - not only the physical strength and whole woman-warrior aspect but also the even-tempered, relatively benevolent (for a Greek god) persona (yes, I know you can come up with all kinds of counter-examples to this last, but amongst all the many, often conflicting, elements that contribute to our picture of this particular goddess, that is a prominent one). So that doesn't leave much of a role for Athena in the WW universe. Not that Marvel has done a better job, of course, but I think that's down to the general antagonism towards mythology that's a part of superhero comics in general, probably with a bit of unconscious misogyny added on.
Bookmarks