http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7uZ4HnVL_8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmktgjQTumQ
And I dont know - how many times do you see her kick someones ass with it in this clip? I lost count.
Then of course, there's this guy ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v06hpUyAN9Y
Last edited by brettc1; 12-22-2012 at 07:31 AM.
Irene Adler: “I would have you right here on this desk until you begged for mercy twice.”
Sherlock: “I’ve never begged for mercy in my life.”
Irene: “Twice.”
I still don't see why you think it's backpedaling. Lennox points out in this issue that power inherited from Zeus often "don't flow correctly," and Heph acknowledges that he made the bracers, so it seems likely that he made the bracers to keep Diana's power from flowing incorrectly. As Heph says, he continues tinkering with his creations "to make them better in case things get worse," so evidently he tinkers with the bracers to let a little more power flow through in constructive ways when "things get worse" in the near future. Where's the backpedaling?
I am not really sure, but didn't Diana use to deny calling the lasso a weapon? (It's from that TT issue where she shows up to take Cassandra away and finds out Ares has given her a lasso as well)
My work: http://www.fanfiction.net/~outside85
Finally caught up with the book. I'm really enjoying it.
I see her using the lasso as a crowd control tool, much the same way you use Batman's grapnel gun in combat in the Arkham Asylum/City games. It's not a weapon that you use to attack your opponent, it's a crowd control tool designed to hinder an opponent and leave them open for an attack with an actual weapon. You'll notice that in that video you linked, she's doing her actual attacks with kicks and punches and wrestling style throws and slams. There's not much you can do to directly attack an opponent with a piece of rope, other than to literally use it as a hangman's noose and hang them with it.
I have no idea what's going on in those first two videos, other than someone playing a with a scarf... How is deflecting a punch with a scarf meant to show the lasso is a viable weapon? She already has her bracelets which are used to deflect strikes...
All I see in that video from that Wonder Woman pilot is her using the lasso to pull people - just like the Hookshot from the Zelda games, or Skorpian's 'GET OVER HERE' pull from the Mortal Kombat games. It's not a weapon in of itself, rather a crowd control tool.
Also, in that last video you do realise that Indy uses a whip and not a piece of rope right? Not that whips are that effective as a weapon anyway, they're more used to inflict pain or rather the fear of pain (hence why they're specifically designed to make the loud cracking sound).
ಠ_ಠ
I think the swords were editiorially mandated to explain the one she sports in JL which does not seem to be connected to her body in any way![]()
I still want to know where is she getting the money from. I mean she sets them up in a nice hotel and his Hera ordering room service
Yeah that's not where I thought they were going to go with the bracelets.. I thought it was a little lame.. They are usually shown to protect her. I thought they were going to reintroduce her being able to create force fields or, produce and command Zeus' lighting, or blasts of conductive force.. Not house other weapons. That was a bit off.. And what of her lasso? There have been 15 issues. She has hardly used it. Isn't the lasso supposed to be the most powerful weapon in the DCU?? I need them to show her using the weapons that she already has, as well as adding the new ones...
Now you're getting it.
The beauty of the lasso is that it is NOT necessarily the item that does damage. It can, but it also a device by which an opponent can be restrained or left open to attack. In this, it is much more elegant and interesting than a simple cleaver. It is a multi-fuctinal device.
However, a weapon that incapacitates instead of spilling blood is still a weapon. The online definition is...
Noun
1.A thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.
2.A means of gaining an advantage or defending oneself in a conflict or contest.
The lasso most often comes under #2, in the same that Spider-Man's webshooters can be used as a weapon.
What you are seeing is a demonstration of a martial arts fighing kata designed around the use of a maleable length of material, like a rope or scarf. The fact that it exists at all demonstrates that this is not a new principalI have no idea what's going on in those first two videos, other than someone playing a with a scarf... How is deflecting a punch with a scarf meant to show the lasso is a viable weapon? She already has her bracelets which are used to deflect strikes...
If you pull people from 30 feet away and slam them into a wall, then the laws of physics [Force = Mass multiplied by Acceleration] dictate that you can cause them injury. Again, Spider-Man does this in fights, as well as using the webs to hurl other objects like a sling [which is also a kind of weapon]All I see in that video from that Wonder Woman pilot is her using the lasso to pull people - just like the Hookshot from the Zelda games, or Skorpian's 'GET OVER HERE' pull from the Mortal Kombat games. It's not a weapon in of itself, rather a crowd control tool.
In the video below you see demonstration of this at
1 minute 45 seconds
2 minutes 10 seconds
2 minustes 30 seconds
You mean this sound?Also, in that last video you do realise that Indy uses a whip and not a piece of rope right? Not that whips are that effective as a weapon anyway, they're more used to inflict pain or rather the fear of pain (hence why they're specifically designed to make the loud cracking sound).
![]()
Irene Adler: “I would have you right here on this desk until you begged for mercy twice.”
Sherlock: “I’ve never begged for mercy in my life.”
Irene: “Twice.”
Right, which is used in conjunction with an actual deadly weapon. I'm not saying get rid of the lasso - far from it. I'm just saying the lasso is not the only item that Wonder Woman should carry. I love it when she's depicted as using a Sword and Shield in combat - you look at her using those and you instantly know she's a warrior.
Like I said, that's fine. She uses the lasso for CC, swords for damage.However, a weapon that incapacitates instead of spilling blood is still a weapon. The online definition is...
Noun
1.A thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage.
2.A means of gaining an advantage or defending oneself in a conflict or contest.
The lasso most often comes under #2, in the same that Spider-Man's webshooters can be used as a weapon.
My point is she already has the bracers for defence. Why confuse things more and start depicting the rope as her melee defence too? Bracers = defence is a simple and easy thing to understand about Wonder Woman.What you are seeing is a demonstration of a martial arts fighing kata designed around the use of a maleable length of material, like a rope or scarf. The fact that it exists at all demonstrates that this is not a new principal![]()
Right, that's fine when she's attacking un-powered humans who she can fling around like toys all day. I'd like to see her up-gun herself a little more against the big huge threats though.If you pull people from 30 feet away and slam them into a wall, then the laws of physics [Force = Mass multiplied by Acceleration] dictate that you can cause them injury. Again, Spider-Man does this in fights, as well as using the webs to hurl other objects like a sling [which is also a kind of weapon]
In the video below you see demonstration of this at
1 minute 45 seconds
2 minutes 10 seconds
2 minustes 30 seconds
So it's a whip now? I thought it was a rope? The very fact that it's being depicted as a whip tells me that it's probably not the best concept for a weapon in the first place.
ಠ_ಠ
Why does she need a shield if she has the bracers?
And yet somehow Superman seems to manage without a weapon designed to cleave flesh and none. How is that?Like I said, that's fine. She uses the lasso for CC, swords for damage.
And goodness knows Wonder Woman needs to be simple for people to get her. The idea that she could use the rope to entangle an opponent as they attack is going to to confuse them. Spider-Man.a writers must pull their hear out explaining those webs. Does he swing on them or wrap People in them ?My point is she already has the bracers for defence. Why confuse things more and start depicting the rope as her melee defence too? Bracers = defence is a simple and easy thing to understand about Wonder Woman.
This must be why the Hulk started wearing brass knuckles.Right, that's fine when she's attacking un-powered humans who she can fling around like toys all day. I'd like to see her up-gun herself a little more against the big huge threats though.
And of you look at JL Crisis she uses the lasso to neutralize Superwoman, someone we saw fight Superman to a standstill earlier. That's a pretty if gun.
It's an UNBREAKABLE rope. Whips don't have to be made of leather. They are in many cases because of properties of that material. But the lasso is made of material which has similar properties.So it's a whip now? I thought it was a rope? The very fact that it's being depicted as a whip tells me that it's probably not the best concept for a weapon in the first place.
Last edited by brettc1; 12-23-2012 at 10:43 PM.
Irene Adler: “I would have you right here on this desk until you begged for mercy twice.”
Sherlock: “I’ve never begged for mercy in my life.”
Irene: “Twice.”
This is a classic case of having your cake and eating it too.
Wonder Woman is an Amazon by geography, not birth. She is a Demigod with Zeus's parentage. Even pre-nu52 and post-crisis she wasn't a true amazon like the others.
WW doesn't need swords. By all rights they should actually be a a hinder to her.
With that kind of unbridled power, who the hell needs weapons? They just portray her having them because she's an "Amazon" and they think she should for the "looks" of it.
Wonder Woman having swords is like me carrying around a paper clip to use as a knife.
Rob Olivera's
Velvet: The Unusual Superheroine!
Geography? Maybe in the sense that her first address as Hippolyta's womb. Or in the sense that one of the two principal streams that fed the river of her life was Hippolyta's bloodstream.
None of the Amazons have Amazon fathers (as far as we know--though there could always be a story about one of the Amazons having a chance encounter with a Manazon.....) What defines an Amazon, genealogically, is having an Amazon mother, so she's as Amazon as anyone.
She is, granted, a lot stronger than other Amazons--and apparently stronger than other demigods ,at least when she's in god mode--and so she doesn't usually need weapons. But if she's fighting gods or god-like beings that are as strong as she is, a weapon might give an advantage. And as she tells Heph in #7, preferring swords (to guns, at least) is the way she was raised. She was learning to spar with (wooden) swords, and eager to try the real thing like a true Amazon warrior, by the time she was 12. So it's reasonable that she could have a cultural and emotional preference for swords.
And she shows against Darkseid that a sword can be a dangerous weapon in her hands. To be a weapon she uses more than once, the sword has to be durable enough to stand up to the force with which she uses it--but I doubt her bracers are manifesting swords that are just going to break.
WW doesn't need swords. By all rights they should actually be a a hinder to her.
With that kind of unbridled power, who the hell needs weapons? They just portray her having them because she's an "Amazon" and they think she should for the "looks" of it.
Wonder Woman having swords is like me carrying around a paper clip to use as a knife.
I really like the use she makes of it in #0--to guide her out of the minotaur's labyrinth so that she can return to her female community. That's not very bad-ass, but symbolically, it makes the lasso the perfect unsword--not about cleaving, but about binding (or, in this case, reunifying).Originally Posted by brettc1
Last edited by slvn; 12-24-2012 at 08:55 AM.
Bookmarks