Last edited by C. Earl; 12-25-2012 at 04:32 AM. Reason: second thought
Always remember this stuff isn't real.
Notable New Comics Shipping the Week of 09-12-12
2000 AD 1796. LEGION LOST 0. MANHATTAN PROJECTS 6. PUNK ROCK JESUS 3. THE SHADE 12.
It makes perfect sense. Because the whole reason Disney bought Marvel was to bring a publishing arm in-house. The whole point is so Disney doesn't have to license stuff out to others. The more controlling interest they have in-house the better, from their perspective anyway.
Notable New Comics Shipping the Week of 09-12-12
2000 AD 1796. LEGION LOST 0. MANHATTAN PROJECTS 6. PUNK ROCK JESUS 3. THE SHADE 12.
lActually it's more profitable to license stuff out to others--you've got people paying you to produce products rather than you investing in the production of products. The more stuff you license, the more money you make without having to invest anything. Lucasfilms has made more several times money through licensing than anything else. And Disney already has controlling interest through Lucasfilms.
Always remember this stuff isn't real.
Of course Disney wants total profits from Star Wars. They get paid for the license...but not the big sales piece. This move gives them complete ownership and the whole sales pie in a way. Its why they moved some books from Boom over time . They could get paid for using the characters sure. But the complete sales pie was them handing it to Marvel and making $$$$. Plus Marvel is a way bigger enterprise than Dark Horse. They realize with the right push Star Wars could sell a shitload of books there and make way more money and exposure before the next sequels.
"Heads up-- If Havok's position in UA #5 really upset you, it's time to drown yourself hobo piss. Seriously, do it. It's the only solution." - Rick Remender
Sucks 200 character limit.
I think that Dark Horse is more capable than Marvel when it comes to Star Wars comics, Dark Horse can produce more Star Wars comics than Marvel can and Dark Horse already has plans for lots of series in the future, Brian Wood's Star Wars can run for many years, same with Star Wars Legacy, Dawn of the Jedi has only begun, same with Agent of the Empire, Dark Times, Knights Errant and Dark Horse can do a tie-in to the new movies just as well as Marvel, if not better. Disney makes more money if Dark Horse is doing 4 series at one time than if Marvel does 1 tie-in to the movies. And if there is a surge in popularity after the new movies Disney makes even more money if Dark Horse has 4 series plus a tie-in running.
Also I had an idea what Disney and Dark Horse could do if Disney wants to make money of Star wars the best way possible right now. All they would have to do is make a commercial for the Star Wars the clone wars comics that Dark Horse has already made and put it at the end of every Star Wars the clone wars episodes. The show is moving to Disney XD or whatever it's called so it wouldn't be a problem for Disney, it wouldn't cost them anything. Dark Horse would benefit from it and at the same time Disney would benefit from it. And maybe if a kid goes to a comic book shop because he saw a commercial for Star Wars comics on TV and sees a cool spiderman or batman comic and buys that one too, Comic book shops benefit from it too. Getting kids to comic book shops is what this industry needs the most.
But there's no quarantee that will happen. In fact, Disney was making more money with the properties they had at Boom than they are now with Marvel. And I'm also doubtful that Marvel will sell more books since I doubt there are that many people reading Star Wars comics in general. If Marvel can get some big names behind it like Bendis or make Star Wars something that can appeal to readers who would otherwise buy Avengers or X-Men, that would help.
Always remember this stuff isn't real.
Apparently this is more than a rumor. This article says it's been confirmed with both Dark Horse and Marvel. Too bad.
http://goodereader.com/blog/electron...comic-license/
I don't know about Boom, but as tight-lipped as Mavel is about sales it's hard to believe this could be said with any degree of confidence that it is based in something other than personal preference of how one wishes the world was. If there's some data to support this, I'd be interested to see a link that pointed to it.
In my opinion is implied in every post. Please make an effort to remember that.
Bookmarks