It doesn't matter what the writer, artist, or editor had in mind when they created it, or what they said in an interview;
all that matters is what is on the page.
It doesn't matter what the writer, artist, or editor had in mind when they created it, or what they said in an interview;
all that matters is what is on the page.
As I understand it, if you are using a tablet with an app, then the file is downloaded to the app and you can then read it offline. But the file is embedded in the app, so you can't juggle individual comics files around. I'm not sure but I assume that if you back up the entire tablet's contents, the comics would be backed up as well.
However, if you are viewing over a regular PC by going to the Web site, then you are essentially "streaming" the comic, and the file doesn't reside on your PC. This is presumably because there are a much greater number of people who have the knowhow to break in to their computers files and rip the comic files out of them for pirating, if the file was there.
Here's a great article on the basics of digital comics: http://marvelmasterworksfansite.yuku...1#.UNMc37nnaUk
It doesn't matter what the writer, artist, or editor had in mind when they created it, or what they said in an interview;
all that matters is what is on the page.
Considering that company is propped up by Diamond and the publishers, the chances of that happening are pretty slim. And if the Singularity does occur, the publishers themselves will host the files, because Comixology will have given them all of the subscribers' account information.
Just curious, but do you have any digitally downloaded anything?
Not saying you're wrong, but due to how easy it is to copy and redistribute files as opposed to physical objects, most companies operate on the "you don't own it, you're licensing it" model. Otherwise, you would be free to copy and redistribute as you see fit, since you own it.
I haven't checked Comixology's EULA, but I wouldn't be surprised if there is some provision that states that if they go out of business you could still access your comics. Does anyone know for sure?
Also, this.
And, unless comixology goes down really really hard (to the point that it kills the brand name), WB, Disney, or Diamond (if they're still around) would most likely try to buy them out.
Yeah, for there to be a problem:
a) Comixology would have to go out of business.
b) ...with nobody buying them out
c) ...with them not giving the publishers the information
I was reading an article about the top 10 or so worst business decisions (like Kodak sticking with film instead of digital, stuff like that). In about 75% of the cases, the end result was the company being bought out or some other thing like that. Very few just disappear.
It doesn't matter what the writer, artist, or editor had in mind when they created it, or what they said in an interview;
all that matters is what is on the page.
No. Buying a service like a telephone or internet connection is one thing, but I won't generally spend money on something I can't physically hold and keep. If I want music, I buy a CD (or a record, or a casette; yes, I still play them, and they still work), if I want a movie I buy the DVD, and I'm not interested in reading comics or books off a screen: I'm a collector, I need to own stuff.
'The marquis. Well, you know, to be honest, he seems a little bit dodgy to me.'
'Mm,' she agreed. 'He's a little bit dodgy in the same way that rats are a little bit covered in fur."
Thanks glennsim for bringing sense into this discussion.
Some people in this thread are acting like mainstream superhero comics are the only ones that existent and there's no such thing as The Walking Dead and all successful IDW comics.
It doesn't matter what the writer, artist, or editor had in mind when they created it, or what they said in an interview;
all that matters is what is on the page.
Fair enough. Wasn't criticizing you, it just seemed like you thought the lack of ownership was an issue with comixology in particular as opposed to a widespread issue that effects pretty much every digital "product".
I think with comics though it's definitely something that they need to look into further, since a lot of readers do have that collector mentality. Unfortunately most attempts at implementing DRM that allows you to actually own a digital product end up making use of that product so complicated that its not even worth it.
On the other hand, I think plenty of companies would be better off just accepting piracy as an inevitability, and instead focus on providing a product that has enough value and is easily accessible enough that it's not worth it.
Just wondering: why no adds in digital? Don't get me wrong, it's nice to watch TV without the commercials, but in comics, the 'fast-forward' button is a flick of the page. Without the cost of paper and printing, adding back in the adds ... wouldn't that add bank to their bottom line?
This is because they're not readily accessible to the general public. They're not on newsstands, they're not in racks at the grocery store, they're not even at bloody Walmart. They're in small, obscure specialty stores. Kids don't run into them anymore, mom won't buy them to keep the kids quiet. They were largely impulse buys and now have to be sought out. Fix it? convince chain stores to put 'em on the magazine racks again. And that's easy to do. Everyone write to all the chain stores grocery and otherwise and ask for it. Not one letter with 10000 signatures, but 10000 letters each with one.
It's an easy fix: demand it. The sales will follow as will a new generation of fans.
Last edited by MFitzH2O; 12-20-2012 at 11:15 AM.
A robotic journey toward the American Dream: MADE in USA.
Bookmarks