"A man can be happy with any woman as long as he does not love her."
Oscar Wilde
Yep. But how does he plan to get her to walk that path, after he found, when she refused to kill the minotaur, that she was an unsuitable disciple for him?
Here's a long-shot theory: he plans to change time so that Diana will have been more hardened and ruthless by the time he tries to begin grooming her as his successor.
The solicit for 17 says that Orion's reason for helping Diana recover Zola's baby will lead to a monstrous betrayal. Well, we know that Orion's mission is to prevent a threat to time itself, right? So maybe Zola's baby has some kind of power that can be used to affect time. The monstrous betrayal would involve War using Zola's baby to try to chnnge Diana's past and personality. Possibly War's means of doing this has to do not only with the baby but also with a motherbox, which is why it was important (according to one of the script pages shown at NYCC) to show that War possessed a motherbox.
The grown-up Diana's sad expression would probably suggest that his plans failed; either he manages to change her past but, in the present-day, she now regrets whatever bloodiness she was manipulated into; or she kills War, to protect Zola's baby, before War can change her past, so she is his designated successor but is no more inclined to take up his role than she ever would have been.
Lotech--I can understand finding the quantity of blood gross and unappealing as a cover image, but I don' think it says anything about whether Wonder Woman still stands for high values. We've already seen the Wonder Woman embraces love and mercy and rejects the ways of war. She's someone who as acted lovingly towards an uncle who tried to perpetually consume her and a sister who has trying to kill her. The cover seems to show us a young Diana as War would have liked her to be, but the grown-up Wonder Woman doesn't look too happy about it, right?
Last edited by slvn; 12-10-2012 at 08:58 AM.
The obvious outcome is not inevitable. The most obvious interpretation is not always the best.
I would be a lot more into this if she herself killed the children. Handed them all swords and hacked them into pieces in an attempt to make Ares love her. He was upset that she destroyed his children and she offered to make more with him. He leaves her because he realized that without her bracers, she's crazy. She put the bracers on, leaving the island to fall for Superman because he is capable of creating the most destruction (which is the secret to really turning Wonder Woman on).
My work: http://www.fanfiction.net/~outside85
Irene Adler: “I would have you right here on this desk until you begged for mercy twice.”
Sherlock: “I’ve never begged for mercy in my life.”
Irene: “Twice.”
No. Think of how much better that would make the book and the DCU if Diana were basically Kratos. She alsmost is now but the title would definitely make it. Having her the GoW would give her the rank she needs to stand out. It would add a much needed anti-hero vibe to her. Superman could even help reign her in and keep her from killing too many. It would also explain why she keeps the bracers on instead of using that power to claim the earth as her own.
How is she almost Kratos now? Kratos, from what I've heard about him, would have killed the minotaur, killed Hera, killed Artemis, probably killed Siracca, and certainly not proclaimed "I love everyone" or tried to give her mortal enemy Hades the gift of self love. She seems closer to being the anti-Kratos. I know you decided early on that id she couldn't be the epitome of goodness and kindness she might as well be the epitome of violence; but I don't share that simplistic black-and-white view, and besides, she's pretty close to being the epitome of goodness and kindness.
The obvious outcome is not inevitable. The most obvious interpretation is not always the best.
Bookmarks