It doesn't actually kill my theory if you think of the previous "Parker" identity as a limit imposed upon the individual we've been reading about all along.
As I've said before, it's the same person under the mask....the person who we've known as Peter Parker, only without the limitation of that identity...therefor making him "Superior"
In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
One might consider "With great power comes great responsibility" a limitation. Without being held back by such a philosophy, this "Superior" Spiderman can be more affective. Now, affectrive in doing what remains to be seen. This Superior Spiderman may choose to be a more affective hero. Or, without such a "limitation" as Great power/great responsibility, this version of Peter Parker/Spiderman may feel that taking care of #1....himself...makes him superior to the Parker identity he had up until this point.
True, being selfish might make his life easier. Personally I think giving up the Spiderman identity would make sense as there are tones of other superpowered people in the mu and living up to the idea of great power/great responsibility has never really gotten Peter anywhere. And if there is anyplace nobility is scorned its the marvel universe. Completely abandoning what has been the core of the character is no different from what they did to Iron Man or Captain America.
In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
Being selfish makes life easier? Is that what kids are supposed to learn when reading Spidey? Is "with great power comes great responsibility" not valid anymore, you mean?
I think thats what Slott was getting at when he said he was going to ruin our childhoods. I think he's going to introduce a story that suggests to us that what we've come to see as being the core of Peter Parker/Spiderman for the last 5 decades, has never been whom the character truly was in terms of his beliefs and outlook, and that this "new" Superior Spiderman...who will STILL be Peter Parker....will be the new status quo from here on out. (until, of course, it all gets undone a couple/few years done the road)
several post deleted.
I get that some Superior Spider-man pages have been illegally leaked to the web and are being covered by another site, that does not change that the scans are illegally obtained. DO NOT POST LINKS TO PIRATED MATERIALS.
Likewise, we arent discussing spoilers to a comic that comes out in january until either the preview is officially released or the comic is officially available.
Feel free to PM each other about your feelings on the leaked images.... but no posting about it on the boards until its officially available.
In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
You'd have to ask Slott but I don't expect you'd get anything but a dismissive "Get away boy, you're bothering me" type of answer. They want you to read the title after all. But given what I said in my last post then yea, maybe the whole power=responsibility equation is as meaningless at marvel now as the US constitution was during civil war and the last She-Hulk series that Slot wrote.
In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
Bookmarks