Fearless Defenders Appreciation

[renne]

Ugh.

I just got into a long argument on the TGWTG forums with someone who "Loved the 6th Gun" but is "Never reading Cullen Bunn again because of the lesbian kiss page". She didn't even read Fearless Defenders. And she kept countering with Joss Whedon, when I pointed out he does the same thing.

God, it's tedious.

joss whedon is even worse for it what with being all fanservicey.

[Songbird/Diamondback]

This just in:

Fearless Defenders #4 is an Age of Ultron Tie in!

http://comicreviewsbywalt.wordpress....ron-checklist/

[Ravin' Ray]

This just in:

Fearless Defenders #4 is an Age of Ultron Tie in!

So the tie-in is not a special issue with a ".AU" designation then? I thought Fantastic Four was .AU.

[Dog]

Didn't Bunn establish in The Fearless that Brunnhilde does not like being called "Val?"

[Songbird/Diamondback]

So the tie-in is not a special issue with a ".AU" designation then? I thought Fantastic Four was .AU.

It says Fearless Defenders #4 right there.

Didn't Bunn establish in The Fearless that Brunnhilde does not like being called "Val?"

If we call her Bru, everyone will think we're talking about Brubaker.

[Lady_Alternate]

It says Fearless Defenders #4 right there.

None of the issues on that list have a .AU designation, despite the fact that we know at least some of the issues in questions will.

[Songbird/Diamondback]

None of the issues on that list have a .AU designation, despite the fact that we know at least some of the issues in questions will.

Oh, I know the whole .AU thing, but I'm just saying, issue 4 is Age of Ultron tie in.

Would explain why we heard nothing about it except for its cover.

...where is that cover?

[Ravin' Ray]

This reminds me that I forgot to ask Bunn if Jocasta will appear. She's not being used elsewhere is she?

[Songbird/Diamondback]

This reminds me that I forgot to ask Bunn if Jocasta will appear. She's not being used elsewhere is she?

...now that you mention it, she's probably part of the Age of Ultron issue.

[Dog]

Oh, I know the whole .AU thing, but I'm just saying, issue 4 is Age of Ultron tie in.

Would explain why we heard nothing about it except for its cover.

...where is that cover?

Doesn't that make it more likely that the guy with the blog omitted the "AU" while transcribing, rather than that Marvel decided to scrap the whole demarcation?

[Green Griffin]

This reminds me that I forgot to ask Bunn if Jocasta will appear. She's not being used elsewhere is she?

well if anyone remembers that she is married to Ultron thanks to Slott, not unless that was undone in Academy but i would say the AoU issue should be for her.

[Songbird/Diamondback]

Doesn't that make it more likely that the guy with the blog omitted the "AU" while transcribing, rather than that Marvel decided to scrap the whole demarcation?

Why the hell are you making a big fuss over the AU?
We know all tie ins to Age of Ultron are AU!!!!
What do you care if there's an AU?!

All AU says is it's an Age of Ultron issue!

[Lady_Alternate]

Because .AU issues are supposed to be separate and independent. As in issues with a .AU demarcation are in addition to the usual title.

So in this case, it would be...

Fearless Defenders #4 - Misty does some cool shit, Val & Annabelle have things to discuss.
Fearless Defenders #4.AU - EVERYTHING AWFUL! Misty Knight comes to terms with the fact that her arm is now evil.

[Songbird/Diamondback]

Because .AU issues are supposed to be separate and independent. As in issues with a .AU demarcation are in addition to the usual title.

So in this case, it would be...

Fearless Defenders #4 - Misty does some cool shit, Val & Annabelle have things to discuss.
Fearless Defenders #4.AU - EVERYTHING AWFUL! Misty Knight comes to terms with the fact that her arm is now evil.

Oh, then if that's the case, WOO WHOO! Extra issues!

[TanGent]

Fearless Defenders #4.AU - EVERYTHING AWFUL! Misty Knight comes to terms with the fact that her arm is now evil.

Lol please let this be the real solicit.