View Poll Results: Does Marvel NOW end the need for a reboot?

Voters
30. In order to vote on this poll, you must be a registered user and/or logged in
  • Yes

    21 70.00%
  • No

    9 30.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21
  1. #16
    Senior Member Paladin King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,024

    Default

    I don't think Marvel ever needed a reboot.

    I think all that talk was just because fans were looking at the huge success, both in sales and quality, over at DC and were getting envious.
    For the best in comic reviews visit:


    WEEKLY COMIC BOOK REVIEW

  2. #17
    I'm a Male ;) DebkoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    8,686

    Default

    All I can say is that with NOW ice been able to get into comics so much easier.
    'If you meet a loner, no matter what they tell you, its not because they enjoy solitude. It's because they have tried to blend into the world before, and people continue to disappoint them'

  3. #18
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Suffolk, England
    Posts
    3,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USERNAME TAKEN View Post
    After going through all the Marvel NOW books (so far) I must say that most of them are easily accessible to anybody (except X-men Legacy which is pretty dense). I gifted copies of Indestructible Hulk, Thor:God of Thunder and Captain America to a couple of my friends off comixology and they were hooked (although one of them hated that art on Captain America which is a shame becaue JRjr is one of my favorite artists). These guys aren't avid comic fans by any stretch of the imagination but I guess digital comics that could be read off their tablets made the proposition attractive to them.

    The Marvel NOW books have not been continuity heavy and can easily be understood by a casual fan.

    The reception to the books has been pretty positive (except with Iron Man) and most people have been pleased by its quality.

    So with that in mind, does Marvel NOW put the necessity of a reboot to bed? And does a simple "re-energization" of the line serve the same purpose of a re-boot without the need for throwing out continuity? Or does Marvel still need to go all out and restart their characters from the scratch?
    The question makes no sense. There was never any "necessity" for a reboot, and I doubt Marvel ever thought there was. People have been obsessed with this ridiculous notion ever since DC pulled their moronic stunt, and I just don't understand why.

  4. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,786

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DaronK View Post
    For me personally, it's a mixed bag. I've enjoyed a lot of the stuff I've read and had no problems following it, except for anything with an X in the title. I still think the X franchise needs a major overhaul, but for now, I'm happy to just stay away from the entire line (except for AOA which is fantastic).

    Edit: I voted no because of the X-Universe, but I'm okay with everything else...
    I gave up on the X universe a long time ago; I thought Marvel NOW would breathe new life into it but instead it put the final nail in its coffin.

    I enjoy Thor but Thor without Loki is like Batman without the Joker.At the moment I'm enjoying the Ultimate line (especially Brian Wood) but I honestly can't understand what they're doing with the Ultimates.

    I wish they had done a reboot in full, because what we have is all over the place - everyone who is anyone is an Avenger these days. And there is a creepy right wing influence around - but maybe that's just Disney!

  5. #20
    Postmaster Addams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,452

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tony ingram View Post
    People have been obsessed with this ridiculous notion ever since DC pulled their moronic stunt, and I just don't understand why.
    Are you serious with that? Thanks to this reboot the sells of this past year have been some of the best in DC history.

    Well, if by moronic you mean making a shitload of money then yeah, how moronic indeed.

  6. #21
    Literate Sasquatch Cryptid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Fuzzy photographs.
    Posts
    632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Addams View Post
    Are you serious with that? Thanks to this reboot the sells of this past year have been some of the best in DC history.

    Well, if by moronic you mean making a shitload of money then yeah, how moronic indeed.
    The sales for the New 52 have been fairly good relative to the current state of the comics industry but hardly the best in DC's history. The overall readership for comics has shrunken by a depressing amount since the medium hit its stride in the 30s and 40s. The reboot has recaptured some attention and brought some lapsed readers back into the fold, but when people describe the tactic as "moronic" they are probably responding to the drastic tactics that have become necessary to retain rather than expand the readership.

    From a creative perspective, both the New 52 and Marvel Now seem creatively conservative to me. There are a few notable successes on each side, including books like Thor and Swamp Thing, but for every fresh idea there are several titles hunkering down in elaborate continuity-laden premises (Green Lantern, All New X-Men) or revisiting familiar ideas with more charm than invention (JLA, Iron Man).

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •