It's not going too far, it's just more self-aware about it.
What scene? Do you mean the whole issue?
I can't see what could seem "ridiculous." It's Batman's ultimate defeat.
Gotham is burning as a result of Joker's ultimate gag, Hurt convinces the president to nuke the city, everybody dies and the city Bruce vowed to protect is in ashes.
Seems like pretty serious stuff to me.
Batman's ultimate foes win.
Awesome issue, nice to revisit the 666 universe even if it was very tragic. Although the end makes me wonder if Damian in the 666 future can even survive a nuclear blast or if even the 666 future can have its own alternate futures? Since in Batman #700 in one of the futures we see an old future Damian mentoring Terry McGinnis as Batman Beyond, so can Damian still eventually be Batman without this issues events happening?
Wonder if we will see Dr Hurt in present times eventually or least a reference to him, like someone trying to dig him up.
Right, but there's nothing written by Morrison you've actually liked, so that's obvious. There's nothing in the entirety of Morrison's run that's more ridiculous than some of Jason Aaron's zanier plotlines, for instance. This is pretty standard stuff for the industry.
And if you're trade waiting, then you haven't read the Bat-Cow scene in proper context.
But the only thing I read by Jason Aaron is Scalped and I like Joe the Barbarian!
That is true. I won't say more, it just seems ridiclous to me after rereading through the earlier Batman stuff in the run by Morrison. So prehaps Inc. Vol. 2 is a much more different tone in comparison to the rest of the run.
I'd say v2 is different in tone from maybe the earlier parts of Morrison's run, but not from Batman & Robin onwards.
You're not alone in liking less wackiness in your Batman books though. I think that's one of the things, in my own experience, that turns people off Morrison even more than the labyrinthine plots. Especially in the wake of the Nolan films.
It is a tough sell to have humourous or surreal moments with a character that people always think of as so serious. But there was a time when Batman was the star of a comedy show.
Edit: Off topic, but if you only liked Joe the Barbarian you'd probably find WE3 and Vinamarama by Morrison more to your liking, if you haven't read them already. They're both kind of out there conceptually, but more... grounded than Morrison's usual stuff. Never read Flex Mentallo, no matter what anyone tells you. You'll hate it :)
Last edited by tylenoljones; 11-28-2012 at 05:29 PM.
Honestly I think the tone in Batman and Robin as well as in Inc here pitch perfect. There's a sense of dread and seriousness, but with this immensely kinetic and surreal tone, and the creepiness of the threats they are up against helps with that surreal aesthetic.
Snyder's Batman is kind of similar, except the camp is just ironic and unintentional.
Bookmarks