Ok, either you clearly don't understand God very well or you're being deliberately obtuse; the Christian, Jewish, and Muslim God are intended to be one in the same; the only difference is the way the three groups' approach to seeing and interpreting God; Christianity views the introduction of Jesus as the fulfillment of Jewish prophecy, while the other Jewish sects available at the time, broke away from the Jewish sect that accepted Jesus as the Messiah; thus, the two groups divided into Christianity and Judaism. Islam came along about three hundred years later and cast a new wrinkle into things, but, essentially, like the other Jewish sects, they appear to not want to accept Jesus as the Messiah; but, similar, there are the Mormons as a similar, newer group; personally, I'm not Jewish, because I've evaluated the available evidence and had (and have) certain personal experiences that tells me to accept Jesus, so, it becomes a major problem for me when I have to deny Jesus' status; before I came to be at this mortal realm through the birth process, I'd already had a certain relationship with God the Father, so, coupled with my memory, certain experiences simply reminded me of who/what I really was previously; Jesus says that He would send His true sheep the Comforter as confirmation; I have the Comforter and when I see sin or consider sinning or actually sin, it grieves me tremendously; additionally, I feel this force continuing to make me a better person; I pray and get answers; I continually reflect upon God each day; I feel and notice this force guiding my life; although this is not physical evidence, for me, it's overwhelmingly other evidence; everything does not have to be physical to serve as evidence. I guess I'm just one of the blessed/lucky ones, but I truly cherish my place. Aside from this, most of those other "gods" have been long for gotten about or do not have a following as compared to just Christianity, yet along the combined strength of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism combined, along with any variations of them. Those other "gods" have had at least 250 years to regain traction, where monarchs have been virtually eliminated, yet still they have not regained much more traction; but, we only remember them because of the crack caused by the removal of monarchs as the common form of governing. Christianity has not been a religion that is a state religion that requires everyone to confirm to it or be persecuted or executed as an alternative, if ever you could make a serious case of it really ever having been such a religion, yet it continues to spread in a viral manner. Additionally, those other "gods" had to be invented after a great act by God. And you misinterpret how the foundation of the Jewish faith formed; it formed not necessarily from someone looking for another "god", but from someone looking for the truth; God was impressed and formed a special covenant with Jews in specific, as a result, and everyone else became to be referred to as gentiles. Adam and Eve were the first of humans, and they interacted with God. Thus, it's not really a matter of a "gods" coming first, but a matter of humans rediscovering God; thus, there would be no way to rediscover Superman, where there is dispute about Superman's status with the other comic book characters with similar attributes. Are you so sure Superman was the first comic book hero, to kind of reduce the example to the level you're referring to? I'll say that Superman has been made the unintended victim of this argument; Superman has good intentions and he respects good people and a benevolent being.
And look at your first example,: I and countless others have believed? Are you saying none of us considered the evidence? Are you saying none of us are/were trained scientist? If countless examples of use believe, what, than, constitute evidence of this sort? That's as clear evidence as you can get. The miracles and resurrection were based on eye witness proof; that's why they were documented and created the strong belief; the problem is that most of the eyewitnesses faced martyrdom for holding firm to what they witnessed a few short years later, so it diminished some of the impact. During that time, the eyewitness, or observer, was the most common type of evidence; and there were laterally hundreds, if not, thousands, of eyewitnesses, increasing the credibility.



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks