
Originally Posted by
Desaad
Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't.
I think what we're saying is -- they can get our money. They just have to put out a better product. That there is a market that is more than willing and eager to buy this book, under the right circumstances.
And, hey, if it's just us, then sure, that's fine. But I'm not sure there is any evidence that Defalco's rather mundane take on the character would be more successful than a more radical departure. Heck, the launched the book as a more radical departure, didn't they?
He comes off as an affable alien trying to adjust to earth customs and ways. He's the typical 'outsider', with no discernible personality. Under Lobdell he was this angry force of nature with a completely abstract consciousness and concept of good and evil, right and wrong, morality in general. Here he's a good natured fish out of water just trying to make his way in the big city.
It's not about what is valid or what isn't valid. It's about what is interesting.
Defalco is just plowing well trod ground, IMHO. I've seen this story countless times before, in all manner of fiction.
I think Superboy can be more, can mean more, can be a voice to some pretty radical ideas, especially in this iteration, with what Lobdell established.
Bookmarks