Pull List; seems to be too long to fit in my sig...
we also should remember that WBs focus is not just DC, as opposed to Marvel Studios (which is what their job is, to make adaptations)
if WB dropped DC projects tomorrow, they still have a whole movie studio
Support your local roller derby league
But execs would probably meddle it up badly anyways.
A lot of people get sentience confused for sapience. Your hamster is sentient, you are sapient. Intelligence is sapience.
About Warner, i've always been surprised that they've ever managed to do so well because it's always been a conglomerate wth a bunch of companies at war with one another. The key was they work better when they do their stuff independent from one another. And trying to make them cooperate can be quite a story, that is why DC comics and Warner Bros. have been difficult when it comes down to do business. Warner Bros. killed New Line because they could not control them but it was a mistake because on its own New Line could be a very efficient movie brand. Example being the LOTR franchise venture. But it can only get worse because after AOL bought the whole thing, AOL got bankrupt and the AOL executives left so now it's like there is no big leader, not one big boss to decide.
Kurt Busiek Says:"Best Avengers Run, Steve Englehart's run in the 1970s. With Roy Thomas's run that preceded it close behind, and the Conway/Shooter/Michelinie run that followed close behind that