Speaking as someone who was an Emma fan before she got involved with Cyclops (especially when she was written by Lobdell), I have to say the relationship with Scott did nothing for me. I could live with (tolerate) it if I avoided the question "why are these two people together?". But once that question is posed I have to feel sorry that there wasn't a writer with the guts to write an Avengers Annual #10 to the Avengers #200-like resolution to Morrison's Jean/Scott/Emma triangle.
Since I knew and liked Emma before NXM, the recognition thing does not apply to me. Neither did the "solidified her as a hero" thing. In fact it is stuff like the Country Club scene that makes her appear as more "villainous" than during her time with Generation X, and when the story touches upon ethical matters she all too often comes over as a self-righteous hypocrite. I began to suspect that in her heart of hearts her ethic is "might makes right" now.
I also don't see Emma really helping Scott to grow as a character except in the sense that Morrison regressed/retconned Scott in a way that made it necessary to grow back to where he had been before.
And on the whole I think Emma profited less from her relationship with Scott (which became pretty bland after a while) as from being given a central role - at the expense of other characters who were killed off (Jean), sidelined (Storm) or systematically destroyed (Xavier).
In the interests of full disclosure: Read the X-Men since the 1970s, became a big fan in the 1980s, Scott used to by my favourite of the original five for a long time, but after he left Madelyne and his son he lost that status and never managed to regain it. The time I cared for Jean/Scott most was during the Dark Phoenix Saga, apart from that I found the relationship a bit too bland.
Honestly, im not sure Emma would be around much if not for her relationship with Scott. Like it or not her relationship with Scott is what kept her in the forefront of this decade of X-Men. It was her way into the in crowd so to speak, and at this point now she's become a regular rather than one the many fringe X-characters. From a character standpoint i think she profited greatly from her relationship with Scott.
And i don't think its fair to blame Emma or Scott for the things that were done to Jean, Storm, and Xavier. While im not sure why Morrison killed Jean, Storm wasn't sidelined but moved to try and elevate Black Panther, and Xavier just lost relevancy as his students grew up. Making him a martyr was probably the best thing they could have done with him at this point. Its even redeemed all his misdeeds apparently, with them now treating him like he was a saint.
Last edited by Godlike13; 11-13-2012 at 01:48 AM.
You're not sure? I am 100% sure of it. Without it, Emma wouldn't have gotten so much spotlight that one gets being in a leadership position, because no one would trust her with it, and there's of course the stories about their relationship.
Killing Jean was inevitable once Morrison tied-up her connection with the Phoenix, removing the "she was on a coccoon all along" crap.
Morrison wanted Storm on the team, but editorial made her stick with Claremont.
Xavier was becoming irrelevant long before Morrison. Even since the 60's you have stories about the X-men outgrowing him, as well as early as DPS in CC's run.
That's right! Al Gore invented the internet, let's all go kick his ass!
I got your inconvenient truth right here, motherf*&¨%!
Donald M.
Agreed. Thanks to her relationship with Scott, I'd say Emma is in Rogue or Kitty territory (i.e. she will never again be off all the X-comics for that long, without returning). She's made it into the movies, in the computer games... Emma can NOW be without Scott and still survive; but she needed that original anchor.
In his defence, he is about equality; his male asses are just as scandelous!![]()
"I don't know how to please you Lord, but I think the fact I try to please you, pleases you."
I don't think I've forgotten anything, actually. I'm talking aesthetics here. He's pencilled "dark" storylines but that doesn't mean his artistic style has gone dark itself. I love his work mind you, but it's been exaggerated and semi-toony since his work back on Generation X. Thankfully he reigned in how angular and uber confusing it had all become circa Steampunk (still can be a bit confusing mind you) but his earlier work on Shade The Changing Man was a much better fit for darker themes than the caricature style and robot fish of Supernovas.
Really depends on how Bendis writes this new series to see whether Bachalo fits in with the themes artistically or not.
Last edited by okpanic; 11-13-2012 at 05:22 AM.
I'm obviously a little biased because Supernovas is probably my favorite X-Men run of all time, and Bachalo and Ramos are my favorite artists of all time - but Supernovas was a rather dark run with some very melancholic themes (and I doubt Uncanny will be much darker), and both Bachalo and Ramos handled that run with near perfection. Much of Bachalo's "light" and "dark" aesthetic is determined by the guy who colors his work. As much as I love Bachalo, I usually don't like it when the guy colors his own work. I loved his work on the Lizard arc in adjectiveless X-Men, but the gravity of the arc, which by all means should have been dark and gritty, was definitely loosened a little due to Bachalo's own washed-out color palette.
Wonder Man > Wonder Woman
All of entertainment can be boiled down to either Sex or Death
No amount of modern revisionism by the vocal internet minority can change the good work Bendis has done.
Who cares? Everyone will buy it. Everyone. Every freaking one. Quality doesn't matter. You'll all buy it, and you all will be thankful for it. You all will beg for more
Say No to decompressed storytelling!
All I care is death metal. Screw comic books!
Say No to decompressed storytelling!
Bookmarks