honestly, I'd mix the two and make her a female carl sagan.
make her in the same role as kari from mythbusters, who is very smart, but more a "presentator of science" then a science maker.
Give her a breadth of knowldge that mixes the other people's talents well.
she can also play a role of ms exposition as well.
Combine it with her spunky attitude and powerset, yes, I do believe she would sell and well. :)
click here for some characters to use in rumbles
“We need to apply the science of communication to the communication of science.” - Preston Manning
True enough. They are far more likely to make her leader of the Avengers- or some version of the Avengers- then try her solo. On some level, she still is just Hank's old sidekick. And look what they did to him: turned him into a failed husband whose very sanity is forever in question.
It's too bad, really, because right now Marvel needs to diversify badly. Take the Avengers label off of these offshoot teams so that they stop looking like a one-trick pony. Or rather 2-trick pony, with the X-Men being the other trick. Right now I'm getting lots more DC stuff then Marvel, and it's all because DC decided to diversify in one mad, creative burst. Marvel will rip off every one of DC's tricks, but when it comes to one that they actually need to mimic, nothing.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." Albert Einstein
Really? Well, when I stopped reading X-Men, Havok was a rarely used character, while Rogue was already hugely popular.
Are you telling me you never noticed that he's a natural leader, especially in the Avengers? Seriously, he's a captain and everything. Get him in a room of Avengers and ask them to choose a leader, everyone points at him. He's been known to turn the position down for that very reason.And where is this Cap stuff coming from?
I never paid that much attention, but I do remember the last story of his I read. Guess what? Ant Man died. lolAnd again, this is Remender, who kills frequently.
Sad but true. And titles like ASM are much the poorer for it. I don't think I ever enjoyed the series as much as when he and Gwen had their little soap opera thing going on. It convinced me that occasional soap is a necessary element to the superhero story. I'm sure fans of Smallville agree.You're right, but in the age of such macho guy stuff, girly is avoided.
Last edited by thetrellan; 11-23-2012 at 05:15 PM.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." Albert Einstein
Last edited by Propagandor; 11-23-2012 at 06:26 PM.
I suppose it would depend on the demographic. Most adults would prefer a pert, pixie-ish woman, but there must be a lot of little boys who think a man who can ride on the back of a giant honeybee is COOL.
Which is why some people are already accusing of Ant-Man to be such a lame and "kiddie" concept, when they first heard news of the movie. "Little boys" is a relatively small demographic, and it isn't like they are starved for choice in the superhero market. When you were a little guy, wouldn't you have loved to be at the least, twenty to twenty-five other superheroes before you even considered the thought of Ant-Man?
And that is the main problem which faces Wright's movie. The target audience is extremely tiny and extremely spoiled for choice with far better and far more recognizable options.
Who in hell would want to make or watch a movie about her ?
A weak superhero who only have her powers thanks to her man and a very superficial and shallow woman in top of that.
Movie of the summer !!
Ant-man is obviously a better character. Not a coincidence that an ant-man movie is going to be released when no one talks about a wasp movie.
Last edited by Castel; 11-24-2012 at 07:03 AM.
Oh yeah, a movie which inspires "LOLs" and "WTFs?" at the mere mention of the title.
Also, yeah you can also describe loads of money making franchises in the same way you did-
Who in hell would want to make or watch a movie about a loser girl who crushes on pale, sparkly teen vampire boys and shirtless werewolves?
Who in hell would want to make or watch a VERY expensive movie about two blue alien cats who make love by connecting their hair braids together?
Who in hell would want to make or watch a movie about a shallow billionaire playboy who is flamboyant, arrogant, a WMD corporate head who needs a metal armor to fight crime?
And most fitting of all, who in hell would want to make or watch a show based off a flop film about a shallow, superficial cheerleader girl who is randomly just given superpowers to slay vampires and demons?
FYI, the dude who made "The Avengers" the billion dollar success it was wanted to make that show, and legions of people ended up watching and loving all of the movies and shows I just mentioned.
Honestly we'll have to wait and see how Ant-Man does. I have no doubt Edgar Wright will make it awesome, but he's not a character who I generally see as having broad appeal on the level of someone like Iron Man or Thor, where their powers basically amount to excuses to blow shit up.
Though if Ant-Man is actually coming out in November, I would not be surprised if they used the Wasp in Avengers 2 first, if for no other reason than to break up the gender ratio a bit. That and Whedon is quite fond of her, apparently.
Thank u. Tearing down Ant-Man doesn't help sell a case for Wasp. The same problems Ant-Man would face, Wasp would face too. I mean u can switch the word Ant-Man for Wasp into the paragraph u quoted, and nothing would change. Tearing down Ant-Man doesn't help the case for Wasp, it hurts it.
And guess what OP the Ant-Man movie is happening. So at this point Wasp's chances are probably gonna depend on how people respond to that. I mean if Ant-Man movie doesn't do well do u think think the chances for a Wasp movie is gonna be greater or lesser then?
Last edited by Godlike13; 11-24-2012 at 09:26 AM.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." Albert Einstein
Bookmarks