Both of them have taken down teams of super-human in glorious and sometiems hilarious fashion. But which of them does it best?![]()
Both of them have taken down teams of super-human in glorious and sometiems hilarious fashion. But which of them does it best?![]()
Nothing tried is worse than nothing gained.
Well does Slade give really terrible reasons for why he is succeeding? Like Batman talking about taking WW down because he punched the air out of her or something. If he doesn't I'd go with Batman since it's like it isn't enough he is doing what he shouldn't be able to do..he's going to give us some asinine reasons as to why it is totally going to work.
A woman can move a lot faster with her skirt up than a man can with his pants down.
If I'm reading the OP correctly this is a "Take all feats in account" so Slade has to take it. His standing in the middle of the street, zero stealth, beat down of half JLA (flash included) is the gold standard for implausible team wrecking.
Batman just physically mauled 5 of the JLA big 7 that one time. There was no real logic to it. Deathstroke was mostly fighting the JLA street levelers, and there were somewhat logical maneuvers involved (silencing Zatana, using mircoscopic vision and a laser point to take out the Atom). Flash got typical speedster PIS'ed, and Kyle Rayner got completely shafted. But if Wally and Kyle hadn't been there, the fight would have been pretty well written.
He blitzed Canary from across a street and beat her by putting a bag over her head.
-_-
Batman totally used the powers of "Gut kick" and "I have a rope" to take out the likes of Wonder Woman and Green Lantern. With prep like that who could logically stand against him.
Deathstroke is only slightly less of a joke than Prometheus, so, going with Batman.
Won 6 Awesome Awards, 2Cool awards, 2 internets, a Raging storm and funniest video award
My RPG Site!
Bookmarks