Yes
No
MACKLEMORE & RYAN LEWIS - THRIFT SHOP - HERE
Ah, I see. You're one of those people who thinks it's clever to have brand loyalty to a publishing company. Says it all, really.
I don't think you're aware of how much exposure those old TV shows have worldwide or how deeply ingrained in the public consciousness they are. Much more so than any comparatively recent cartoon series. There isn't a single day going by without the Batman series being shown on several TV channels throughout the world even now, forty years after it was cancelled. Supergirl was last shown on British TV, as far as I'm aware, about three months ago. You seem to be operating under the delusion that the whole world shares the exact same frame of reference of your personal social circle.
With the amount of stick they'd get for cancelling it, they'll hold out a little longer. Personally I only read the first issue, and didn't enjoy it at all.
The problem is that like most of the X-Men, Storm doesn't really function as a solo character.
PAD's All-New, All-Different X-Factor: From The Beginning
X-Poster of the Month & Year: (August) 2012 | March 2013
Come to Deathstrike & .AČ: Mutant League Champions 2013
Exactly.
I think it really comes down to the fact that the X-Men as a team are the franchise.
The Avengers are a bunch of smaller franchises put together (Hulk, Iron Man, Cap, Thor, plus a lot of smaller characters). Which is why those members can carry their own book, because they are a thing all by themselves. They have an identity outside of the Avengers.
Most X-Men can't hold a solo book because you are only getting a fraction of something. Wolverine is the usual exception, mainly because he sort of became his own thing decades ago.
"That's a very nice school you have here, it'd be a shame if someone dropped some Sentinels on it"
Same thing with the Fantastic Four. The only one really capable of functioning as an independent character is the Thing. And there's nothing wrong with that-there's no reason a team character needs to be a major solo star. They don't need to be A list characters, the team itself is the star.
You clearly know very little about the history of DC, or possibly just have a very shaky grasp of time. "40 years ago" would be the early 1970s. The average age of a DC reader back then was probably about ten years old, and I assure you, even 20 years ago (by which time they were aiming rather older) DC was far from "dead" (the late eighties/early nineties were a considerably more profitable time for DC or Marvel than now is). And contrary to your apparent conviction, I'm afraid you don't have to be under 30 to count in this world.
If any X character is an artifact its Charles. They can't however let him stay dead because of how synonymous with the property he is.
Storm is barely even the most recognizable X female and probably holds onto the spot due to the writers inadvertently sabotaging the competition.
I agree about Schism however. It wasn't constructed along any sort of generational line or anything besides random team A and random team B.
The FF members don't have the capacity for believeable independent action. Writing the idea that Sue for instance is going to start flying solo on her downtime would require a major redefinition in the character's relationships.
It wouldn't take much of a leap at all to move an X character off on their own in the same way DC franchises the Batfamily members. Its really as simple as getting across that Wolverine(their model on how to do it) is someone who doesn't/wouldn't live at the mansion/school whatever, and that being an X-Man is a set of ideals and not a job i.e. Avenger.
Bookmarks