LEAVE RON GARNEY ON IT
STUART IMMONEN (Instead of All New X-Men)
FRANK CHO (Instead of Savage Wolverine)
I would like to say for the record that this is the FIRST TIME I've withheld dong when someone was so desperately asking for some.
Brian C Wood
People are quick to forget/ignore the power of art. As a form of healing, and as a form of propaganda.
- Kid Kamikaze10
Garney is really good, better than pretty much anyone else on that list except Copiel and Immonen. His style suits the book perfectly too, I dunno what there is to complain about really.
I threw up in my mouth a little when I got to Crain. SRSLY?!
X-Poster of the Month: Janvier 2010 et Mars 2012
--- something something I do! ---
I think Ibraim Roberson is THE GUY to do it! hehehehe... I would love to do it, but I would love to see Adi Granov doing something with Uncanny X-Men, ate least 3 issues. (Can you please do it, Adi?)
Phil Noto would get me interested in this series.
I know. Comes off very sexist and condescending.THIS. Especially when the OP's main complaint is that the WOMEN aren't drawn pleasingly enough for him. WTF???
Except for a couple, I would. Crain is a muddy mess. Bianchi--just no. No to Cho. Brooks is a no, as well.I won't say terrible artists, but yes, pretty much this.
X-Poster of the Month: May 2013
The Best There Is At What I Do
i rarely find any of garneys characters visualy appealing, not just his women
it would be sexist and condensending if we where talking about real people, but thease are characters who have been illustrated beautfuly in the past, why shouldnt they be done so now?