
Originally Posted by
Trallis
So much is wrong with this post. Okay, you're entitled to your opinion that undoing events in comics because they are unpopular with fans is acceptable. I disagree, but that's not the problem I have with your post.
First problem: "Tune in today and watch 20 X-Men die. Next week, watch 40 of them die."
I challenge you to name 20 x-men who have died. Not 20 x-men who died in Ultimatum. 20 x-men who have died since the name x-men was first given to Charles Xavier's team of mutants in the 1960s. It's possible that 20 characters have died in the entire Marvel Universe.. but 20 X-Men in one day? No.. and i'm challenging you to name 20 x-men who have died since the 60s.
That's why the Ultimate Universe is so much more realistic. Yeah it's a world of fantasy where impossible things are possible, but that shouldn't mean that all good characters are invincible. In a world where good and evil people with god like powers wage constant war on each other all over the world, there are gonna be some unfortunate deaths. As soon as fans decide that deaths of likable characters are unacceptable, or can be reversed, the stories lose all credibility. Who cares if Peter Parker is going up against his entire rogues gallery with a bullet wound on his side if he can't die? Did you care when the chameleons had JJJ and Peter tied to chairs in the warehouse? I did, but I definitely wouldn't have cared if that hadn't been the Ultimate universe, because I would have known neither of them were gonna die. When JJ got shot, I thought he was really dead because it's the UU. The incident wouldn't have rattled me at all if it hadn't been the UU.
Ok so you can't name 20 x-men who have died. I'm wondering if you can name 20 characters who have died without mentioning an Ultimate character. They can be mutants, non-mutants, villains, civilians.. name 20 people who have died in Marvel comics without mentioning the Ultimate U. It may be possible, but it's not gonna be easy. If you can do that, you still haven't proven your point, because you claimed it was possible for 20 x-men to die in one day.. and then on another day, 40 more x-men. So I'm letting you get away with just naming 20 people of any kind.. as opposed to the 60 x-men you claim died at some point in a matter of 2 weeks. The most deaths that ever happened in a single event was Ultimatum and I think it was less than 40, and far fewer than 20 of them were x-men.
So comics are depressing because characters are dying all the time? I think you're very wrong about that. Comic sales are dying because creators refuse to undo events that readers didn't like? Look man, Peter Parker's death was obviously not going to be a happy event. Refrax5 stated that bringing Peter back would be bad writing, and you said no. Can you explain this? Cheap crap like bringing someone back from the dead to please whining fans is definitely bad writing. Another example of bad writing is writing a character death that DOESN't bother people. All of this complaining from fans about Peter dying is probably the best compliment that's ever been paid to Bendis' writing. If you can make people care about the death of a completely fictional character then you've done a great job. If people are still whining about it over a year later.. wow.
And I agree with you, comics should be fun, but if all the characters we like are unkillable, I think the fun is gone. There has to be some danger. These guys are supposed to be super heroes. They laugh at danger. They risk their lives every time they put on the mask and go out there to protect the innocent. Peter died an amazingly heroic death.. why can't you just let it be? If any character ever deserved to have such an epic death it's Spider-Man. He's a character that we all know so well that he feels like a real person in our lives. The gravity of his death in just the Ultimate Universe on the comic book world is an amazing honor to the character. He died and everyone cared. He's not a real person, he's not even the main universe spider-man, and people are still upset over a year later. That's damn good writing and that's a damn good character.
Okay there is more wrong with your post. You say these writers would rather have sales go down and lose all their fans before admitting they were wrong on something. Then you go on to complain that Peter sold his marriage to the devil. But wasn't that an example of writers admitting an idea was bad, and not keeping it because they'd rather not lose all their fans or see sales not go down in flames? They took something back and you want them to take THAT back, and you use that as an example of them refusing to take things back.
Seriously dude.. get your thoughts straight. Writers in the 616 are trying to keep things fresh while writing characters who have already had about 50 years of stories written about them.. and writers in the Ultimate U are trying to provide something new to fans who are tired of the old predictable nature of a Universe where actions rarely have consequences. You don't have to read the UU if you don't like that.. but you have to understand that that's what the UU is for. It's an ongoing story where things change like the real world and characters evolve like real people. I love Peter Parker, and Ultimate Peter Parker was actually cooler to me than the original, but if they brought him back in the UU, the UU would lose all of it's appeal for me because there would be nothing unique about it. It would just be the 616 rebooted. lame
Bookmarks