Steven Spielberg (Friend of Lucas, has often come close to directing a SW)
George Lucas again
David Lynch (Almost directed ROTJ)
David Filoni (director of Clone Wars movie and series)
Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight Trilogy)
Joss Whedon (Serenity, Avengers, various TV series)
J. J Abrams (Star Trek, Super 8, various TV series)
Frank Darabont (Almost directed TPM)
Kathleen Kennedy (Basically is co-chair of Lucasfilm)
Gendy Tartovsky (The original Clone Wars micro series, various TV series and Hotel Transylvania)
Brad Bird (Incredibles, Mission Impossible IV)
Francis Ford Copolla (Godfather trilogy & friend of Lucas)
Peter Jackson (Lord of the Rings trilogy)
Guillermo del Toro (Pan's Labyrynth, Hellboy)
Nothing's gonna happen without a warning
I have a comic book podcast, my name is Luro on it. Please listen for the good of mankind.
Again, the OT never says that the Force depends on your DNA or how many you have in your cells. And by the new rules re: midichlorians in your blood, even being the son of a Jedi wasn't a guarantee that you'd be Force sensitive. There's no way Yoda and Obi-Wan would know Luke even had midichlorians. Remember that we don't see them testing L & L in ROTS.Unique to the DNA of one person. That's why blood transfusions from a Jedi to a normal person does nothing.
Wasn't he 18 in TESB?Because Luke was twenty three and didn't think it was possible. None of that changes nothing about his ability to do it. Just why he had trouble doing it. Nine year old Anakin would not question his ability to lift an N-1 Fighter, if he were instructed to do so. That's why Yoda says, "You must unlearn, what you have learned". You're problem is that it has to be one or the other, because you don't like the concept. The reality is that both work in tandem. Midichlorians are why the Jedi and Sith can do what they do. They have to believe in it through the training. That is a large part of the training.
And there are problems in the concept, because the concept is flawed. In 4 movies, there is no problem/no mention of Jedis not being able to marry. Everything works fine until we're told that they can't love/get attached and then the idea of jedi family dynasties goes out the window and then you wonder why everyone was so fine with the idea that Luke was the son of Skywalker. That's where it doesn't match.
Midichlorians are why the Jedi and Sith can do after TPM. Before, it was all belief.
Those are concepts that never made it into the movie, and for good reason. Midichlorians was one of such ideas that should have remained as a scribble between other ideas.No, that's different. That's developing the characters. The cybernetic arm started off with Kane Starkiller, went to Montrose, then to Obi-wan and finally to Vader. The only change was Vader doesn't smash his arm at all, but Obi-wan retains the same dialogue about being too old that the others have. Han being an alien isn't much different, since the character continued to change and evolve and that green alien went on to become Greedo.
Even with all the Force working for him, it took the non-believing scoundrel to give him an all clear. To show us that we need everyone when we're fighting against the most pure form of evil.And that is true in the PT as well. None of which takes away from why it was Luke and Luke alone, instead of Luke and Han.
No, it shows that it was one of hundreds of concepts -and a pretty shallow one, at that-, regarding Anakin. He even put that Anakin was a mutant? Doesn't mean he was hanging with Xavier's crowd.It's stuff that shows that Lucas was working with Midichlorians in mind, back in 77.
Massive testing of newborns of every species in all the Core worlds? The paperwork alone would give bureaucracies conniptions. It's an organization older than anything they've known. The Jedis are ubiquitous. That should be enough to have people stand in line in order to try to join up. Maybe have masters travel the galaxy, searching for promising recruits.The purpose is that the Jedi found new recruits by using Midichlorian tests, which we see Qui-gon do with Anakin. That was not the first time, given the conversation between Obi-wan and Qui-gon. The purpose also explains why Anakin's children are capable of defeating their father and the Emperor in ROTS and into the OT.
And Luke was capable of defeating Darth Vader and the Emperor because trained to be a Jedi and believed he was saving the galaxy.
The children have midichlorians, but they cannot be detected unless the Force is active within a Jedi? Then why are they hidden? They don't know how to use the Force, so they can't be sending out red flags. Leia being out there, in the Senate, no less, squashes the theory.You're forgetting, the Jedi and Sith aren't sensing Midichlorians, they're sensing the Force when it is active within a Jedi, which is why both children were hidden. They're not after those who have Midichlorians in general. They're after people who have Jedi training which is why they're after Luke in TESB and ROTJ. Everyone has Midichlorians, but not everyone can learn the ways of the Force without training. Sidious considers Luke a threat when he senses the disturbance in the Force, which occurs right after Luke arrives on Dagobah. Sidious even states that Luke must not become a Jedi, because he can destroy them. And when Luke chooses to be a Jedi at the end of ROTJ, Sidious decides to kill him. They're not going to test Leia, because she's not a Jedi. She has no training. Vader only takes an interest when he learns that he has a daughter from Luke.
Now, Luke being trained first by Obi-Wan and then by Yoda, makes him a threat because he is now a bona fide Force user. He believes he can use the Force -and we see he can, albeit slowly, and that's why Vader-Sidious go after him.
Not a midichlorian in sight.
Last edited by Guapo Méndez; 01-02-2013 at 05:13 PM.
Hey guys, I was always confused with the whole prophecy. So in The Clone Wars, The Ones kept balance to the Force by having a Light and Dark, correct? When they died, Anakin basically BECAME the new Ones except he was one being.
Was it that Anakin had to be the mix of both Light and Dark to balance it out?
OR was it that the brother becoming Dark corrupted the galaxy and took the balance away so Anakin had to sway Light to restore order?
Pull List; seems to be too long to fit in my sig...
The whole Ones thing was because Father wanted someone who could control both his son and daughter to replace him in his throne as he felt that he was to die soon, something that only Anakin, being conceived by the force or whatever, was able to do. He believed that was what the One prophecy was about (and who could blame him). So he manipulates events to get Anakin to Mortis and it backfired spectaculary.
...And does Mr. Goddanm Batman says so much as ''Thanks''? OF COURSE not. That'd hardly be GRIM AND GRITTY, would it?
-DKU's Jim Gordon.
And oh boy did the Ones get some backfire.
And continuing the EU possible wipe discussion. I don't think anyone would care if they said the books and comics aren't canon. Just as long as there is no complete contradictions, like Han or Luke dying in 22 ABY, I'm sure everyone will be happy.
Now come to think of it, maybe having the YV War and the Second Galactic Civil War act as the Clone Wars, in a sense where we hear about it and it's left a mystery besides the fact that *SPOILERS* 2 of the Solos die. *END SPOILERS* It's like the Clone Wars TV show. You got some books if you want the details, but most people won't read it.
The new trilogy could take place in some time like 46 ABY. That way, we could have Luke in an Obi Wan/Jin position. Have him training Ben or Jaina and have either (Or both!) take over the role as "the new Luke" after he dies (I mean, the Qui-Gon to Obi-Wan to now Luke line have bad luck when it comes to having padawans.)
But with the rumor of Darth Vader coming back, maybe do a different version of Dark Empire except starring a clone of Darth Vader. I never liked the way the Dark Empire Saga was played out. a different, but with a few similarities, could make the story original while still giving a nice nod to the EU. Not that I really WANT Vader back. His story ended.
'The marquis. Well, you know, to be honest, he seems a little bit dodgy to me.'
'Mm,' she agreed. 'He's a little bit dodgy in the same way that rats are a little bit covered in fur."
When DE was a Marvel project, the clone actually was going to be Vader.
Dark Empire IMO has some good spots, such as Leia starting to embrace her Jedi heritage (Although the books would make this development much slower); the introduction of Nar Shadda (Which would appear in later novels, comics and video games), and I've always thought Cam Kennedy's art style stood out from a lot of the other Star Wars comics. Plus the Dave Dorman covers were great. However I thought Boba Fett wasn't well characterized (He seemed more like comic relief, especially in DE II) and bringing him and Palpatine back was a bit too much...
....and then of course there's Empire's End, a sort of rushed-looking conclusion that pretty much wiped everything in time for the Jedi Academy novels.