As "I, Vampire" #13 begins its latest shift to the status quo, Joshua Hale Fialkov and Andrea Sorrentino continue to construct an entertaining series that keeps the reader hopping.
Full review here.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: REVIEW: I, Vampire, #13
-
10-26-2012, 11:03 AM #1Mild-Mannered Reporter
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 21,222
REVIEW: I, Vampire, #13
-
10-26-2012, 12:39 PM #2BANNED
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- San Jose, Costa Rica
- Posts
- 7,529
this is the same reviewer that gave Catwoman 13 and BoP 13 3.5/5
so is this saying that this issue was just like those 2
that doesnt sound right
this needed another star
-
10-26-2012, 05:15 PM #3New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 53
The score is 3.5 stars, yet the review appears to be totally positive? That's kinda weird.
-
10-27-2012, 06:33 PM #4Elder Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Dublin, Ireland.
- Posts
- 17,259
The body (Content) of any review should be what's important. Ratings are silly.
But if you trust ratings and 5 is the best and 1 the least, then 3.5 is pretty fricking strong as it is 1 grade past middle ground!"You can't trust them as poets either. The true poet is anonymous, as to his habits, but these boys have to look, act, and apparently smell like poets"
Flannery O'Connor on the beats.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks