In the Year 2525
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8
My personal philosophy is that unless the extra title is a team up book (in the vein of such classics as Marvel-Team-Up, Two-In-One or DC's Brave and the Bold) that an additional title is almost always overkill. The reason I loved those titles is that it used popular characters that most fans liked (Spider-Man, Batman) and gave some face time for quality lesser known characters and concepts that usually wouldn't have been used in the character respective main titles.
"I was handed a chocolate bar and an M-1 rifle and told to go kill Hitler."--Jack "King" Kirby
I remember Marvel in the late sixties and seventies. Each character had one book. It was easy to follow their adventures, and when there was a cross-over with another title, it meant something (sort of like Daredevil is now). I like Wolverine, Hulk and many others, but trying to follow these characters through mega events, cross-overs and multiple titles has become a headache and just isn't as enjoyable as it should be.
I don't know. You just have to enjoy each story on it's own merits. Arrange it into some sort of continuity if you must, but don't let Cap's appearance in Uncanny Avengers or Avengers (or, or, or...) impede your enjoyment of the flow of the story in his own book.
No. It would not. Characters that don't move books aren't going to start populating books because of a moratorium on A-listers. You'd just have less books every month.
Freedom is the ability to live without fear of persecution. Nothing more, and certainly nothing less.
Bookmarks