Well what I mean is, over the years on forums I have heard people say something along the lines of "I have no interest in reading about Constantine" - I even remember somebody saying he was a less likeable character than Rorschach!!!! I remember thinking "So you prefer the violent sociopath to a character who struggles with his conscience to do the right thing but doesn't always manage to? You know, like a flawed hero, probably something people can empathise with a bit better than a violent traumatised vigilante!"
I just get the impression some people (probably primarily superhero readers) just have a knee-jerk reaction to him and Vertigo in general.
You are obviously not one of them though!
Well my first encounter with him was through Garth Ennis' run and he may not have been the nicest guy in the world but he was underneath it all, a decent bloke with some sort of moral compass. Someone who you would probably have a lot of fun with on a night out but yeah, not someone you would want to get too close to.
I have been reading Delano's stuff in trades and yeah, he does some horrible things to his "mates" but its mainly in the interest of self-preservation and you just see it as a bloke who has very little options most of the time.
I know a lot of people say Delano's stuff is the best but it hasn't really taken off for me yet. First volume was good but the next 2 were a bit of a slog to be honest. Looking forward to the Family Man being reprinted in a couple of weeks as I've heard thats fantastic. But so far it can be a bit purple-prosey and heavy-handed and it feels more dated than the Ennis stuff.
That's another thing I can never understand - you have one of the most celebrated runs on the character by the team of Ennis and Dillon, one of the most celebrated pairings in modern comics, and it's not kept in print, and doesn't even seem to be that widely known about in general. Why? It's bloody fantastic!
Well the whole point of Constantine is that the only reason we like him is because we're seeing him from the Fourth Wall and can understand him on an interpersonal level. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to tolerate him. A lot of writers have talked about how the character has become so personal to them to the point where "he writes himself." So the character is still "a bastard" as he's always called, but we at least know where he's coming from.
Rorshach is an odd comparison, because he was meant to be unlikable, but the audience reacted much differently.
Sequential Anarchy
Current favorite ongoing series: Fatale, Saga, Judge Dredd, Batman Inc, Batwoman, Daredevil
Rorshach is only likable because of the extreme situation he gets put into. On a day to day basis he is a terrible person and barely a functioning human. When you put him up against Viedt he becomes a sort of tragic character as he accepts his death calmly in the face of the apocalypse.
John on the other hand is perfectly likable on the day to day basis, hanging with his friends/having a pint etc. It's when the chips are down he becomes really scary.
Sequential Anarchy
Current favorite ongoing series: Fatale, Saga, Judge Dredd, Batman Inc, Batwoman, Daredevil
Check out my New Blog! Just a random assortment of ideas, thoughts, and reviews!
http://heshouldreallyknowbetter.blogspot.com/
!!!!!spoilers for Hellblazer, guy who said he was going to read the family man don't read this!!!!
I notice John has become decidely more brutal over the years. In Highwater he reaaaaaly fucks up those Nazis, not to mention the prison riot in Hard Times. What he did to the guy who killed his ex-girlfriend in Haunted was pretty nasty too. Compare with how tore up he is to kill the Family Man, a straight up serial killer.
Sequential Anarchy
Current favorite ongoing series: Fatale, Saga, Judge Dredd, Batman Inc, Batwoman, Daredevil
Sequential Anarchy
Current favorite ongoing series: Fatale, Saga, Judge Dredd, Batman Inc, Batwoman, Daredevil
Bookmarks