Steve McNiven's gorgeous "Amazing Spider-Man" #695 cover shows us all of the players in this issue and indicates that the Kingpin just might be the source of Spider-Man's greatest headache ever.
Full review here.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: REVIEW: Amazing Spider-Man, #695
-
10-05-2012, 01:31 PM #1Mild-Mannered Reporter
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 21,300
REVIEW: Amazing Spider-Man, #695
-
10-05-2012, 01:41 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 2,901
This thread suggests that Dan leaves the book after 700. Do we know that for a fact?
Doc Ock - I'm Peter Parker.
Peter Parker - Not anymore Spider-Man. From now on I'm Peter Parker.
Good post Ryan. - Oldschool
I cannot recommend Scarlet Spider enough, but here's trying.
-
10-05-2012, 01:44 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 2,901
Forget that^. Just saw the teaser image for Superior over at CS.
Doc Ock - I'm Peter Parker.
Peter Parker - Not anymore Spider-Man. From now on I'm Peter Parker.
Good post Ryan. - Oldschool
I cannot recommend Scarlet Spider enough, but here's trying.
-
10-05-2012, 03:29 PM #4Literate Sasquatch
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Fuzzy photographs.
- Posts
- 632
This review manages to talk about three or four corporate or behind-the-scenes narratives without saying very much at all about the story on the page. We have speculation about the end of Brand New Day's story elements, speculation about Marvel NOW, speculation about the build-up to issue #700, and even speculation about Giuseppe Camuncoli's sleep schedule, but virtually no commentary on the issue other than a promo-prose plot summary and the incisive observation that the colors are, you know, colorful. Part of what I like about this book (and Dan Slott's cagey stance on future plots) is that it's easy to read the stories instead of reading how they fit into the state of the company and the industry. Can we have done with this kind of dubious insider talk?
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks