Totally true. What you said. Grant's X-Men actually CHANGED the X-Men. And people like BENDIS have tried to undo his changes to the X-Men even though they don't write them - especially during these crappy events. (Like through House of M, the Xorn arc in New Avengers, by making Wolverine an Avenger who can be 100 places at once as compared to his old record of 5 or 6 places at once, etc.,) Separately we had writers like Whedon, Remender, and Aaron use some of Morrison's developments.
But is Aaron really writing this? How much of it is editorial direction? It's just dumb and loud nonsense. It's out of character for Aaron. (Sorry) I can't believe it. And he really must hate Colossus, Magik, and Emma because what they do in this issue makes little sense.
This is like reading a terrible "X-Men: The End" sort of book. I can't wait for Bendis to desecrate my memories of 50 years of the Original 5 with his new take on them. It will be like reading Chuck Austen write Nightcrawler or Gambit. (Yay, Gambit has fart powers and Nightcrawler is a demon!)
Your little story here of how Bendis thought up AvX would be more entertaining in comic book form than AvX actually is.
Hey, I've read a lot of the board's excellent commentary over the past year or so, so that helps. Maybe I can write something a little more constructive next time. Thanks.



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks