Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 34
  1. #16

    Default

    I was okay with the art. The story on the other hand not so much. Never mind that I hate everything AvX related but the issue was dumb.

  2. #17
    ShaunN
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Fredericton, NB
    Posts
    2,143

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ExodusCloak View Post
    Phoenix Cyclops has displayed telepathy in other issues but here Ross says that Emma is a mind reader and would sense him coming? Why wouldn't Cyclops sense him coming?
    No obvious explanation for this, but this is somewhat consistent. It is true that Cyclops has shown telepathic powers as a Phoenix but, on the other hand, he does not seem to be a particularly sensitive telepath. I refer here to the Avenger invasion of Utopia in AvX #6. At that time, it was Emma who alerted Scott to the fact that the Avengers were trying for Hope again. So, I guess we're meant to conclude that his telepathic powers are not that extensive.

  3. #18
    Elder Member XPac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    53,850

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShaunN View Post
    No obvious explanation for this, but this is somewhat consistent. It is true that Cyclops has shown telepathic powers as a Phoenix but, on the other hand, he does not seem to be a particularly sensitive telepath. I refer here to the Avenger invasion of Utopia in AvX #6. At that time, it was Emma who alerted Scott to the fact that the Avengers were trying for Hope again. So, I guess we're meant to conclude that his telepathic powers are not that extensive.
    Cyclops obviously isn't used to being a telepath. In large part, most of the P5 have been largely using their own original powers rather than doing anything particularly elaborate with the Phoenix force. Emma still relies heavily on telepath, Cyclops still relies heavily on eye beams, and Namor still essentially went around punching stuff. I think we can assume there's a bit of a learning curve as far as using the Phoenix.

  4. #19
    Liverpool John Ossie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,513

    Default

    I liked the art but I didn't enjoy the issue personally.
    Melissa - 19th December 2012

  5. #20
    Junior Member Juggy313's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    386

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Monty_Cristo View Post
    seems pretty obvious to me that Cyclops is the super-ego of the phoenix 5. if you kill him, the energy will be transfered to Emma or Magik. Magik wouldn't hesitate to kill them all. and Emma might do it simply because they killed Cyclops. it's a ridiculously stupid plan.
    Didn't think of that... Great point... That was a stupid plan..
    Used to be Jugganuat on the Marvel Boards...

  6. #21
    Senior Member insidemyhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    3,653

    Default

    Maybe I went into it not expecting much (I'm pretty neutral as far as Red Hulk goes), but I thought this issue was actually pretty good.

  7. #22
    Senior Member stewart48's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,161

    Default

    Bendis should have developed some sort of side-plot for these avengers issues. I like the occasional one and done story or tie in but all of these issues could have been skipped and replaced with AVX. Even Remender wrote a good story but the whole timeline of events gets confusing between his and Bendis' Avengers books.

    Gillen has been weaving in his storyline for months and it fits

    and Aron's book keeps the school aspect alive and still drives what could be important character moments for future reference. Even though its a tie there are still character developments that link you into this being a monthly ongoing ex. Toad's creepy\funny Husk obsession, anybody can jump in a get the comedy and history and anyone staying knows its an ongoing story development. Bendis seems to want to bludgeon people with the idea that people are in relationships, or spell out the role they fit into. Of course this rant probably has more to do with the fact I believe Wolverine and the X-men is the best X-Men book in years and Avengers seems to have been sputtering along until Bendis could finish his run rather than have anything planned, which was what made the original New Avengers so great for 50 plus issues.
    BAD TOUCHSCREEN TYPER

  8. #23
    Elder Member XPac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    53,850

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stewart48 View Post
    Bendis should have developed some sort of side-plot for these avengers issues. I like the occasional one and done story or tie in but all of these issues could have been skipped and replaced with AVX. Even Remender wrote a good story but the whole timeline of events gets confusing between his and Bendis' Avengers books.

    Gillen has been weaving in his storyline for months and it fits

    and Aron's book keeps the school aspect alive and still drives what could be important character moments for future reference. Even though its a tie there are still character developments that link you into this being a monthly ongoing ex. Toad's creepy\funny Husk obsession, anybody can jump in a get the comedy and history and anyone staying knows its an ongoing story development. Bendis seems to want to bludgeon people with the idea that people are in relationships, or spell out the role they fit into. Of course this rant probably has more to do with the fact I believe Wolverine and the X-men is the best X-Men book in years and Avengers seems to have been sputtering along until Bendis could finish his run rather than have anything planned, which was what made the original New Avengers so great for 50 plus issues.
    I think the difference is that the Avengers are essentially the POV characters for the main book at this point. So we're seeing all the really important Avengers stuff right there in the main book. They're all right there.

    The X-Men tie-ins do feel a lot more important, because you frankly don't see their side of things in the main book. Lately you don't even see the X-Men at all aside from the P5.

  9. #24

    Default

    Truly horrible issue: it makes very little sense, I'm sad a legend like Simmons penciled this.

    Ross plan is idiotic ("I'm going to assassinate Cyclops with a bullet in the head..." and he STUDIED the damned P5!)

    He does things he shouldn't be able to do (sneaks past ALL of Utopia defences in "Ross mode")

    He loses and the X-Men claim they don't have a way to contain him because he punched out the observer (couldn't they also learn he LOST the power that allowed him to punch the Observer and beat Silver Surfer and now he's just a very strong guy?)

    So what do they do? They send him back to the Avengers... In XML Ilyana sends Rogue to another planet to get rid of her... if they could not contain Rhulk why not just sending him away? Why giving the Avengers such an asset back?

    The fact the X-Men know how to land Rhulk in Wakanda is not consistent with the main story (I know there are ways to rationalize this... but we all know it was just bad editing).

    BAD ISSUE.

  10. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haquim View Post
    Truly horrible issue: it makes very little sense, I'm sad a legend like Simmons penciled this.

    Ross plan is idiotic ("I'm going to assassinate Cyclops with a bullet in the head..." and he STUDIED the damned P5!)

    He does things he shouldn't be able to do (sneaks past ALL of Utopia defences in "Ross mode")

    He loses and the X-Men claim they don't have a way to contain him because he punched out the observer (couldn't they also learn he LOST the power that allowed him to punch the Observer and beat Silver Surfer and now he's just a very strong guy?)

    So what do they do? They send him back to the Avengers... In XML Ilyana sends Rogue to another planet to get rid of her... if they could not contain Rhulk why not just sending him away? Why giving the Avengers such an asset back?

    The fact the X-Men know how to land Rhulk in Wakanda is not consistent with the main story (I know there are ways to rationalize this... but we all know it was just bad editing).

    BAD ISSUE.
    Actually he still has his power absorbtion ability. He just chooses not to use it.

  11. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by devinofthedead View Post
    Actually he still has his power absorbtion ability. He just chooses not to use it.
    Didn't Banner take it away because it was killing Ross?

  12. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Haquim View Post
    Didn't Banner take it away because it was killing Ross?
    No Banner told him that he lost it, but he was lying. You figure that out in Scorched Earth. Banner tells him if he keeps using it then he will either never be able to turn back into Ross, or never be able to turn back into hulk. Or something like that. I really was thinking he was going to be forced to use it on the P5 but I guess not.

  13. #28
    Junior Member nojarama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ventura, CA USA
    Posts
    216

    Default

    Ross's plan, as many have stated, is flawed. I was actually hoping he would kill Emma first!

  14. #29
    Senior Member gregyo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    3,461

    Default

    I think Cyclops should have put Rulk in the X-brig, with all the other supervillians. Seriously, they just sent a bad guy on his merry way.

  15. #30
    BLOOD OF THE MACHINE Mechano's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,640

    Default

    This could have been one of the greatest issues of all time. Master Simonson on art chores... depicting the rulk's demise. Instead it was just the rulk blathering on.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •