Batman #11 Preview/ Discussion

[Guglio08]

I think you are confused and should re-read the post you have been making such a big deal out of.

I used those questions as examples of faulty logic that is forgiven in comic books. My point was that Snyder's book was getting nailed for using the same logic that other books get a pass for.

No, you are moving the goal posts. You asked for something, I gave it to you, so you claim that I misunderstood you. That's such a cop out response.

Not to mention - the 3 "requirements" are losely fitting. By "remove his mask" or "shoot him" in the face, I am referring to the time old "we have Batman tied up and essentially defeated. Lets give a speech and and kill him by slowly dipping him in hot lava."

Lex Luthor acting as president is a bit different than the National Guard stepping in a long time ago to get Gothom under control. I think it is fairly clear what I was pointing out here.

No, it isn't. You didn't ask for vague examples, you quoted three things. That's asking for specifics. I provided you a story arc that contained everything you wanted, semantics aside, yet you refuse to do as you promised. That is why it's completely useless to have any kind of discussion with you. There's no point in doing anything you ask of us because we'll never get a solid response back. BTW, that is cowardice.

[zur en arrh]

I'm a week late reading this. I'd have been better off not reading it at all. I've done my share of complaining about this book in the past, I won't do it again here. I'll just say this issue gets my vote for the worst in the entire arc, and leave it at that.

[tylenoljones]

No, you are moving the goal posts. You asked for something, I gave it to you, so you claim that I misunderstood you. That's such a cop out response.



No, it isn't. You didn't ask for vague examples, you quoted three things. That's asking for specifics. I provided you a story arc that contained everything you wanted, semantics aside, yet you refuse to do as you promised. That is why it's completely useless to have any kind of discussion with you. There's no point in doing anything you ask of us because we'll never get a solid response back. BTW, that is cowardice.

That's why I made the comment I did earlier. He asked a very specific question, received multiple responses, and didn't say a word. And yet he comes back, and tries to change the parameters of what he thinks is an acceptable response. I'm not even going to indulge him.

There's absolutely no point in answering him if his response is only going to be ridicule if he can make you look bad, or silence (until he finds someone new to argue with and hopes you aren't looking)if you come up with a fault in his logic.

[LetsGetNerdy]

Well, I finished it right now. And I am not that happy with it. I guess, I will drop Batman for a while and look out for reviews of the coming Joker run. Maybe I am a bit tired of Batman, maybe there is too much Batman out there. But at least, I was not very happy with the last 3 or 5 issues. And 11 confirmed that.