No, no, no, no, this thing does not AT ALL resemble those two jets. At all.
They have sleek straight line designs while this has random sharp parts all over the place.
This ED is twice as big as a tank..... it dont think it needs stairs.
I thought the original Robocop was a lot of fun. I hope I have as much fun watching the remake as I did the original.
Olivier Coipel - The best damned artist on the planet!
Shout out to Kev Walker! You're doing a hell of a job!
Find & follow me on Twitter & Instagram. Check out arfguy
I really like that ED design. It's recognizable but actually looks like something that might function.
I went "holy shit!" about it no-selling a tank cannon, also. No way you're killing one of these with a flight of stairs or a novelty-sized rifle.
I'm guessing the new Robocop will be much more mobile than the Frankenstein-walking of the original.
"Family Guy jumped the shark when i stopped getting high every time i watched it. " - Alex
I'm more bothered by what I've read concerning the remake of Robocop's design. Not least being that he'll be "very human", with a "see-through visor" so that we see the actor's eyes.
Kinnaman is stepping into Peter Weller's metallic shoes and presumably his metallic helmet, but one thing he's emphasizing is that this RoboCop will look and move differently.
When I asked how much of him we were actually going to be able to see, Kinnaman didn't hesitate.
"We'll see me," he promises. "The visor's gonna be see-through. It's going to be much more of a human performance. There's not going to be any twitchy robot [he mimics very mechanical robotic moves]. Our vision of how a robot is going to be in 2046, it's going to be a very human skin, it's gonna look very human. I'm going to be able to put my signature on the body language, too. The first 'RoboCop' movie is one of my favorite movies. I've seen that movie probably 15 or 20 times. But from an acting standpoint, walking around just moving your jaw, it's not so interesting. So this is going to be an opportunity to really bring a full performance to it."
That sounds like a complete 180 of the original design, which emphasized that Robocop was very much NOT human, at least until later in the film when he becomes damaged and we see the eye behind the visor, and then the entire face reveal.
I guess that's why this is a "remake", but damn...
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read"- Groucho Marx
Illustration Gallery
2D Animation Studio
I'm kind of so-so on the idea of the remake. The casting and director choice seem pretty good for it in my opinion, but some of the ideas I'm hearing coming out of the plot area sound iffy to me. Robo being more human and having a see-through visor? Doesn't him being more human right from the get-go kind of defeat the entire point of what the original movie was about (besides the 80s satire, of course). One of the key points of the movie was that you couldn't take Murphy's humanity away even if you stripped his human pieces away and buried him into a machine. And the original movie portrayed this so well by showing some of his human traits slowly leak out over the course of the movie, until he finally becomes Murphy again at the end.
Also - OCP now stands for OmniCorp. This is a totally fickle complaint, but OmniCorp doesn't sound as big and blatantly evil as Omni Consumer Products does in my opinion. Also, doesn't that kind of kill the whole "OCP" nickname for the company too? Yeah, there's an O, C, and P in the name OmniCorp but if I try to apply 'realism' to it I would imagine the shortname for that company would be OCRP.
Eh, Comics is a pretty cool guy...
I think they are trying to bring the conflict between Murphys human side and his "programming" more to the forefront....it was there in the original film but didn't really come to the forefront until later
Support your local roller derby league
So it's not going to be Robocop? Is going to be Cyborgcop?
BTW if it's a see-through visor..... doesn't that mean everyone is going to know who he is?
Bookmarks