The whole point of Peter originally finding Ben's killer is to realize that he was the same guy he let get away earlier and then feel guilty over causing his uncle's death.
The course of events in ASM makes catching him unnecessary, but it will be interesting to see Peter's reaction when he does...
We get a camera shot of the WANTED poster on his computer at the end of the movie. It's an unresolved plot.
They made this movie in view of parts II & III before this even hit cinemas. You can always rely on kids to be dazzled by Spiderman spinning his way around new york. It's a giving.
"You can't trust them as poets either. The true poet is anonymous, as to his habits, but these boys have to look, act, and apparently smell like poets"
Flannery O'Connor on the beats.
Last edited by Emissary of Justice; 07-10-2012 at 05:09 PM.
Well, I'll well past the point where I can claim to either know or care what "dazzles the kids." That said, the fact that he's still on the loose is why I said it was resolved "on some level," said level being the emotional one (for the reasons Pauly T explained). Unless there's some big twist planned (i.e., he was working for Norman Osbourne and was sent to murder ben or he becomes a supervillain) his actual apprehension will be pretty anitclimactic. In the larger story/character sense, the guy's capture doesn't mean much.
christ, i hope not. i nearly fell asleep during his "quest." it rang so hollow after Peter not showing even a sliver of guilt for treating Ben and May like garbage just before the death scene. i don't think Garfield's as good as Tobie at crying on demand. all i saw in his performance was emo and self-pity.
Funny thing is, I saw that scene in the trailers and I assumed they were going to kill Captain Stacy with falling debris like in the comics. They made such a point of it!
Overall, I felt like this film fell short of the Raimi franchise, even though it was decent.
They danced around some stuff they should have spelled out in no uncertain terms, like Peter's deliberate connection to Uncle Ben's death. In spite of the fact that he even has Gwen Stacy as a confidante, he never once explains how his sense of responsibility is connected to Ben. To hear him talk, it's more about the equation he gave Connors.
"I came to the conclusion that the optimist thought everything good except the pessimist, and the pessimist thought everything bad, except himself." -- G.K. Chesterton
He didn't explain it to anyone in Raimi's film. We got that moment when Peter confronted the burglar and realized his fatal mistake.
My point being that Raimi went for the direct approach which served Amazing Fantasy 15 so well.
Webb's film danced around that connection, which could have at least been nailed down when Peter found an actual confidante.
Just not a fan of Peter hunting for the criminal (and not even finding him.) Stan Lee got it right the first time around, and there's really no need to try and be more clever about it. Because it doesn't work as well. It's okay to hit your audience over the head with the most important moment in Peter's development into a hero.
"I came to the conclusion that the optimist thought everything good except the pessimist, and the pessimist thought everything bad, except himself." -- G.K. Chesterton
It doesn't dance around it, but it's certainly more trite and ham-fisted.
"You can't trust them as poets either. The true poet is anonymous, as to his habits, but these boys have to look, act, and apparently smell like poets"
Flannery O'Connor on the beats.
"I came to the conclusion that the optimist thought everything good except the pessimist, and the pessimist thought everything bad, except himself." -- G.K. Chesterton
"I came to the conclusion that the optimist thought everything good except the pessimist, and the pessimist thought everything bad, except himself." -- G.K. Chesterton
Bookmarks