Garth Crooks makes some interesting comments about the Terry trial -
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...terry-trial-fa
What's more disappointing than anything is the comments section, a general mix of offensive nonsense.
If there's one thing that's come out of this, it's hopefully that the spotlight will lead to some progress against actual racism on and off the pitch.
Terry's defence is that he thought he was repeating what was said to him, this is one context where lack of censure for saying what he said could be considered allowable, though the magistrate was unsure of this himself in his remarks. It's worth pointing out that the magistrate thought Terry a credible witness, and he did not in any way think he was racist, or "massive racist" if you prefer.
It's also worth pointing out that the alleged affair with Vanessa Perroncel is referred to as alleged because of actions she made against the papers who did say an affair happened, and then had to print retractions. In both cases, there was not enough proof, and we're meant to be good enough to have a presumption of innocence.
However, if Terry had been found guilty, I still wouldn't have thought he was racist, it just wouldn't seem likely given the people around him day-in, day-out. He would've been proven to be worse than racist if proven guilty though, someone who knows better, and who therefore fell lower, rather than just an ignorant idiot as racists tend to be.
I won't castigate him without enough evidence, but neither will I crow about the result and excuse the fucking shameful behaviour of some fans who've abused Ferdinand on the terraces since this has all happened.
Bookmarks