
Originally Posted by
Desaad
No, I see what you're saying, its just that at this point in comics psychic powers are so mundane, so common, that I think putting Superman into that box almost kind of dates him to a time when that was a lot more novel. Certain Byrne latched onto the idea and made it clear that his abilities were psionically derived (stealing from himself, as he had established that earlier with Gladiator).
But I don't think Superman needs to be explained away in concrete terms that way. He's an almost mythical figure, and rather than identifying the exact mechanics of the way his powers work, I'd rather just leave it relatively vague - senses which we have no names for - that HE'S labeling as sight/sound/etc. It feels more like an outgrowth of his nature as a big brother/father figure, always watchign in a good way. The way that for years Green Lantern rings had no power against the color yellow due to 'a necessary impurity', and it was left at that. But it in fact underlines the fact that the hero is all about courage, weak against the color of cowardice.
It's one of the things a lot of writers who try to replicate Ellis' technobabble don't really capture; it's not the scientific words that get people, it's the romance you put into it.
Bookmarks