Post Your Favorite Wonder Woman Cheesecake!

[Eliseu Gouveia]

Oh, for the love of....

Batman/Superman fans don't post sexy art of their favorite characters. This tells me that despite protests to the contrary a lot of Wonder Woman fans are just under the tent for the boners and not because of anything about the character itself.

Are you one of those who believes it is impossible for a guy to lust over someone and admire them at the same time?

You DO know sex is not the only reason marriages happen, right?

[XanatosVanBadass]

[Superdog]

Oh, for the love of....



Are you one of those who believes it is impossible for a guy to lust over someone and admire them at the same time?

You DO know sex is not the only reason marriages happen, right?

Well, I am married. So yes, I know that. We are talking of a fictional character here, not a person. Does this fictional character exist primarily as

(A) a vessel for disposable male sexuality, i.e. something to wank to?

or

(B) some sort of intellectual, thematic or storytelling potential?

It certainly started as (B), but now I would say it's probably closer to (A). And people wonder why comics are stuck in a "genre ghetto". Do Shakespeare fans share fan art of Lady Macbeth with huge cleavage and a thong? Probably not.

I'll leave you to your fan wanking, just don't let me hear you wonder "Why don't people take comics seriously?" or "Why can't comics reach a mainstream audience?" or "Why do people look down on people who read comics?"

[Don-Jack]

I don't wank to these images and I believe the others neither.
And the starter of the thread said to keep it classy, which was mostly fulfilled.
Sexiness can be art too.
And I would not want most of these images in her comic book. This is just cheesecake fan (or professional) art.

[Mr. Holmes]

Well, I am married. So yes, I know that. We are talking of a fictional character here, not a person. Does this fictional character exist primarily as

(A) a vessel for disposable male sexuality, i.e. something to wank to?

or

(B) some sort of intellectual, thematic or storytelling potential?

It certainly started as (B), but now I would say it's probably closer to (A). And people wonder why comics are stuck in a "genre ghetto". Do Shakespeare fans share fan art of Lady Macbeth with huge cleavage and a thong? Probably not.

I'll leave you to your fan wanking, just don't let me hear you wonder "Why don't people take comics seriously?" or "Why can't comics reach a mainstream audience?" or "Why do people look down on people who read comics?"

Amen. This is like all those people in outrage that they can't see Power Girl's drawn cleavage anymore.

[Maximum Impact]

Well, I am married. So yes, I know that. We are talking of a fictional character here, not a person. Does this fictional character exist primarily as

(A) a vessel for disposable male sexuality, i.e. something to wank to?

or

(B) some sort of intellectual, thematic or storytelling potential?

It certainly started as (B), but now I would say it's probably closer to (A). And people wonder why comics are stuck in a "genre ghetto". Do Shakespeare fans share fan art of Lady Macbeth with huge cleavage and a thong? Probably not.

I'll leave you to your fan wanking, just don't let me hear you wonder "Why don't people take comics seriously?" or "Why can't comics reach a mainstream audience?" or "Why do people look down on people who read comics?"

Dude, who jacks off to cartoons? I mean really, this is the internet. There's far better fap material available and dammit it's free.


HALLELUJAH!

[Maximum Impact]

Amen. This is like all those people in outrage that they can't see Power Girl's drawn cleavage anymore.

No, this is people trying to look down their noses at others and police their entertainment.
This is Amerikkka! We're free over here! Mostly.

[Gaelforce]

Folks, if you don't like the subject matter, please take it elsewhere.

Discussing what the fans do or do not do with animated pictures is not a topic for discussion.

Edit - A few posts have been deleted in order to keep us on topic. Post your pictures, discuss (tastefully ;) ) the images if you wish, but no more talking about those who post the pics or their reasons for doing so.

Next round of deletions will probably be accompanied by warnings, so let's not stray from the thread's purpose, please.

[XanatosVanBadass]

Well, I am married. So yes, I know that. We are talking of a fictional character here, not a person. Does this fictional character exist primarily as

(A) a vessel for disposable male sexuality, i.e. something to wank to?

or

(B) some sort of intellectual, thematic or storytelling potential?

It certainly started as (B), but now I would say it's probably closer to (A). And people wonder why comics are stuck in a "genre ghetto". Do Shakespeare fans share fan art of Lady Macbeth with huge cleavage and a thong? Probably not.

I'll leave you to your fan wanking, just don't let me hear you wonder "Why don't people take comics seriously?" or "Why can't comics reach a mainstream audience?" or "Why do people look down on people who read comics?"

Actually, I'd argue Wonder Woman was created with both ideas in mind (inspiring young female readers and titillating young male readers).

[SteveGus]

Do Shakespeare fans share fan art of Lady Macbeth with huge cleavage and a thong?

Inspiration striking.......

[XanatosVanBadass]

^ Plus wasn't she nude in the Roman Polanski version?

[dupersuper]

Where's the Amanda Conner pic from?

I see nothing.

[dupersuper]

Who's the other woman?

[SteveGus]

[Fused]

Where's the Amanda Conner pic from?

Whaaaat you must read Ame-Comi Wonder Woman if you like Amanda Connor Wonder Woman:

http://www.comixology.com/Ame-Comi-I...omic/DIG001462