I know Kevin Nichols through a guy that knows a gal. Small world!
If nihilism didn't take some delight in destruction one might suspect nihilists were an unnaturally morbid sort.
-Theophilus
I think you may have missed the part where I said he didn't have to deal with any of the repercussions from OMD. Yes he lost everything you said he did but because he can't remember losing any of it then those repercussions are meaningless to him & he goes on living his life blissfully unaware that anything is amiss.
I know Kevin Nichols through a guy that knows a gal. Small world!
If nihilism didn't take some delight in destruction one might suspect nihilists were an unnaturally morbid sort.
-Theophilus
It's a repercussion he's unaware of thus making it meaningless from his perspective, thus he's not dealing with it. I mean really how do you feel the impact of something you can't remember?
It has nothing to do with me wanting the story revisited the fact of the matter is that he isn't in any way, shape form or fashion dealing with any repercussion of making that deal with Mephisto.
"I came to the conclusion that the optimist thought everything good except the pessimist, and the pessimist thought everything bad, except himself." -- G.K. Chesterton
No, what you were describing is attaching a value and reasoning to wanting to be informed based on your own baises.
This is just plain nonsense. You can want to know what is happening with something you love even if that thing you love is being run into the ground. You're trying to tie everything about the character to modern era and that's ridiculous. My interest, even though I am reading now, wasn't created by anybody working at Marvel now. It was a 90s cartoon show and the idea of the character (which goes back to Lee/Ditko/Romita). The desire to be informed is bigger than a bunch of guys who are screwing things up. Peopl don't move on because nothing about their desire has changed. They simply aren't getting their desire satisfied by the current caretakers. What you're suggesting is that if you have a bad girlfriend one time you should give up dating altogether, because you just need to move on, that love thing isn't going to work out. It's patently ridiculous. Your desire for love is bigger than one heartbreak. It's bigger than just that one person you loved. No one behaves in this manner. For those that dislike the current direction, or even those who are simply unsatisfied, they're not going to give up on the character because of a bad experience (at least, some aren't,some are of course going to be driven away), because that bad experience doesn't change the core that sparked that desire in the first place. You think far too small. The desire ain't coming from the people doing the work now. It's coming from a different place entirely.
When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up.-C.S.Lewis
I know Kevin Nichols through a guy that knows a gal. Small world!
If nihilism didn't take some delight in destruction one might suspect nihilists were an unnaturally morbid sort.
-Theophilus
and thats exactly what axel did too isnt it?
Feel however you want. I know ive taken a complete walk when is dislike something. For example... I left X-men for a long long time because the stories sucked and the art was terrible. I didnt even check out what I was missing. Clean break. If you arent making the clean break and are obsessing about knowing and criticizing every new issue.... then it cant be all bad. Youve not walked away.This is just plain nonsense. You can want to know what is happening with something you love even if that thing you love is being run into the ground. You're trying to tie everything about the character to modern era and that's ridiculous. My interest, even though I am reading now, wasn't created by anybody working at Marvel now. It was a 90s cartoon show and the idea of the character (which goes back to Lee/Ditko/Romita). The desire to be informed is bigger than a bunch of guys who are screwing things up. Peopl don't move on because nothing about their desire has changed. They simply aren't getting their desire satisfied by the current caretakers. What you're suggesting is that if you have a bad girlfriend one time you should give up dating altogether, because you just need to move on, that love thing isn't going to work out. It's patently ridiculous. Your desire for love is bigger than one heartbreak. It's bigger than just that one person you loved. No one behaves in this manner. For those that dislike the current direction, or even those who are simply unsatisfied, they're not going to give up on the character because of a bad experience (at least, some aren't,some are of course going to be driven away), because that bad experience doesn't change the core that sparked that desire in the first place. You think far too small. The desire ain't coming from the people doing the work now. It's coming from a different place entirely.
Put it this way when you break up with a significant other because they did something that ruined them for you (lets go with cheated on you)... Do you then still follow there daily exploits? Do you really want to hear about it?
Honestly, compared to the married years I would say he was better off during everything since OMD. He's on easy street compared with the drama of the likes of Clone Saga, the Other, Lobster Man, House of M, Sin's Past, Civil War, Back in Black. He has fewer NPCs now, with no girlfriend and Aunt May out living somewhere safe with her hubby, how can that be more stressful?
He's happier and more well-adjusted now than he has been since forever. No Aunt May to worry about! Holy Crap!
Perfect humility dispenses with modesty.
Maybe? How is him being wrong help you being wrong though?
You're basing everything upon what you would personally do, which, like I said before, is thinking things are too small. It can be all bad and you not walk away. And furthermore, "all bad" is moving goalposts anyway. "that bad" was the original standard, and considerably different. But in either case, what you would do and your reactions to situations are not the be all and end all for interpreting behavior. Perhaps you would stop keeping up on information, I imagine there are thousands of people who have done just that. But not everyone is going to behave the way you do. Some are going to behave differently for different reasons. You cannot assign YOUR reasons to THEIR behavior. Some are going to hate every single issue and buy it anyway because they want a complete run. Some are going to hate every single issue and create online campaigns about it. Some are going to love every issue and not buy a one. I know you REALLY want that conclusion to be true, but there's no basis in objective reality for it. People have different motivations, action is not reason.Feel however you want. I know ive taken a complete walk when is dislike something. For example... I left X-men for a long long time because the stories sucked and the art was terrible. I didnt even check out what I was missing. Clean break. If you arent making the clean break and are obsessing about knowing and criticizing every new issue.... then it cant be all bad. Youve not walked away.
Put it this way when you break up with a significant other because they did something that ruined them for you (lets go with cheated on you)... Do you then still follow there daily exploits? Do you really want to hear about it?
When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up.-C.S.Lewis
youve yet to prove his opinion wrong. For that matter youve yet to sway me on mine.
Again, since you've ignored the example I gave for where I was coming from, If you catch your significant other cheating and break up with them, then follow them around trying to keep up with their lives, I'm not going to label you part of the norm. Id put you squarely in the still likes them / doesn't think they are all bad category. If you feel the norm is for people who elect to break up with someone that cheats on them to then stalk them.... then I cant begin to even see eye to eye with you. Its fine to check base every once and awhile but fanatically reading spoilers on a bi monthly basis is just proving the point for Axel. You can justify it however you want... but the point still stands. You are still a reader and that cant mean that its all bad because if it were you would have left (or at the least not checked back as frequently). So I'm going to just agree to disagree with you because we are at a fundamental impasse here.You're basing everything upon what you would personally do, which, like I said before, is thinking things are too small. It can be all bad and you not walk away. And furthermore, "all bad" is moving goalposts anyway. "that bad" was the original standard, and considerably different. But in either case, what you would do and your reactions to situations are not the be all and end all for interpreting behavior. Perhaps you would stop keeping up on information, I imagine there are thousands of people who have done just that. But not everyone is going to behave the way you do. Some are going to behave differently for different reasons. You cannot assign YOUR reasons to THEIR behavior. Some are going to hate every single issue and buy it anyway because they want a complete run. Some are going to hate every single issue and create online campaigns about it. Some are going to love every issue and not buy a one. I know you REALLY want that conclusion to be true, but there's no basis in objective reality for it. People have different motivations, action is not reason.
Bookmarks