Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 94
  1. #16
    Moderator/Teacher Joe Acro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Near Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    27,538

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CTpitch View Post
    do we really need spoilers we already got another thread of fans ripping black fury a new one with panels in it as well
    Yes. In fact, I'd recommend using the other thread to continue the discussion of making such a character and use this one to discuss the merits or faults of the actual issue--not the decisions behind it.

  2. #17
    Chaotically Neutral Monty_Cristo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    43,464

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KurtW95 View Post
    First of all: THIS IS AN ATROCITY!!!! AN ATROCITY I TELL YOU!!!!!!!!!
    Second, why do all Marvel's black males have to be bald?
    i think they should have introduced a new character who has been an adult since the civil rights marches and had no idea why. he'd still have that fro and sideburns look and have (like Logan) operated as a merc or intelligence operative. i think i might have liked that guy better than Marcus.

    or i guess they could have given the SHIELD directorship to John Wraith

  3. #18
    Long Live the Legion Zero Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    4,325

    Default

    I think if they would have just called him Marcus Fury it would have been fine. Calling him Nick Fury Jr just comes off as dumb and lazy. We get it Marvel you wanted a black Nick Fury, but man this was a lame way to do it.

  4. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zero Hunter View Post
    I think if they would have just called him Marcus Fury it would have been fine. Calling him Nick Fury Jr just comes off as dumb and lazy. We get it Marvel you wanted a black Nick Fury, but man this was a lame way to do it.
    Yeah, that kinda says it all.

    I just want Marvel to do something with this guy! He could very well be an interesting character. It would be interesting seeing the MU through the eyes of relatively normal people who were more or less forced into the super-hero side of things. It could be very interesting! But we'll probably not even going to see much of him! He'll probably be here for a few years and then never seen again.

  5. #20

    Default

    Hmmm....I just dont know what to think. I mean, i get it that they want there to be some connection to movie goers but...i frankly think this was pretty stupid
    Read Comics. Be Happy.

  6. #21
    Moderator Expletive Deleted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    15,257

    Default

    I thought the reveal of "Cheese" as Agent Coulson was well done. He'd been a fun character throughout, so having him both save the day and get to stick around was a nice touch.

    As far as Marcus's story goes, I guess it'll depend on where they go with him from here. I really hope Marvel finds some way to keep him distinct from the other Nick Furys, new name and new appearance notwithstanding.
    Expletive Deleted

  7. #22
    Elder Member jackolover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    23,438

    Default

    So what was the point of Battle Scars? Some Ranger appears at a funeral because his mother was assassinated to bring him out in the open? Marcus Johnson was in the dark his whole life, not knowing he was related to a legend of the MU. It was like one of those sleeper cell stories, going on in CW:Frontline and Winter Soldier. You don't know they're out there, but now and then, Marvel will pop one of these guys out unexpectedly.

    The only connection to Fear Itself, to my mind, is this event dredged Marcus out of his embedding. If it wasn't for FI, Marcus would still be a Ranger and wouldn't know he was Fury's legitimate son. More accurately, if it wasn't for Hickmans Secret Warriors, and Fury killing so many of Orions lives, Marcus would still be invisible.

  8. #23
    New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    19

    Default

    something happened in texas and cities south of dallas didn't get comics, so i didn't get to pick this issue up. from what i've read, i can piece together what happened with marcus, but what happened with nick fury sr.?

  9. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jackolover View Post
    So what was the point of Battle Scars? Some Ranger appears at a funeral because his mother was assassinated to bring him out in the open? Marcus Johnson was in the dark his whole life, not knowing he was related to a legend of the MU. It was like one of those sleeper cell stories, going on in CW:Frontline and Winter Soldier. You don't know they're out there, but now and then, Marvel will pop one of these guys out unexpectedly.

    The only connection to Fear Itself, to my mind, is this event dredged Marcus out of his embedding. If it wasn't for FI, Marcus would still be a Ranger and wouldn't know he was Fury's legitimate son. More accurately, if it wasn't for Hickmans Secret Warriors, and Fury killing so many of Orions lives, Marcus would still be invisible.
    When you put it like that, it sounds like they actually planned this out.

  10. #25
    Senior Member Wolf_Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,140

    Default

    I guess I enjoyed this issue. There just didn't seem to be any suspense or anything though, but it managed to get to the ending well enough. Overall I wish the series had paired up father and son from the beginning instead of what now just seems to be three issues of filler. I like the characters of Nick Jr and Coulson, but they missed out on making the passing of the torch more impactful.

  11. #26
    Journey's End? Wellman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,082

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zero Hunter View Post
    I think if they would have just called him Marcus Fury it would have been fine. Calling him Nick Fury Jr just comes off as dumb and lazy. We get it Marvel you wanted a black Nick Fury, but man this was a lame way to do it.
    I agree, it isn't like everyone doesn't just call Movie Fury by his last name anyway. Naming him Marcus would keep them distinct separate individuals, if they decide to pull the trigger and have him take a larger role later.

  12. #27
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,415

    Default

    Well looks like Grifter Hawkeye is not alone. This new Nick I shall dub him "Movie tie in Fury" for he is just that, a tie in to the Avengers movie. With no real character other than Marvel wants a Sam Jackson in the 616.

  13. #28
    Go West RolandJP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    No need to be mean. 'Cause, remember: no matter where you go... there u are
    Posts
    26,999

    Default

    Once in awhile there comes a limited series. That make me love Marvel all over again.

    This is that series.
    "Until the Lion writes his own story, the tale of the hunt will always glorify the hunter." - African proverbs
    My Blog
    http://oxymorontopia.blogspot.com/

    BEBOP--"Roland = pinnacle of objectivity"

  14. #29
    The One and Only Spidey616's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,340

    Default

    Well.....at least they didn't retcon original Nick Fury out of existence

  15. #30
    Senior Member Mundungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,843

    Default

    Regardless of any of the Marcus Johnson controversy, I thought this story was overall bland. It was trying to hit certain beats without real flow.

    I don't really care that Marvel wanted a black Fury. But why would he go by Nick Fury when he's been Marcus his whole life?

    It just didn't feel natural. It's kind of like a video game tie-in. It tries to get out by the time the movie comes out, but isn't given enough time to truly incubate. That's what this felt like.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •